<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2000 Years Surface Temperatures Time Series Lag Plot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/</link>
	<description>The Power of Numeracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Galkowski</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/#comment-13611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Galkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=107#comment-13611</guid>
		<description>Please yes on the datasets, to:

bayesianlogic -at- acm -dot- org

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please yes on the datasets, to:</p>
<p>bayesianlogic -at- acm -dot- org</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/#comment-13610</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=107#comment-13610</guid>
		<description>Images before a certain date were lost in an intrusion.  The datasets are available, do you want them?  Normally the PAF is a guide to the lag, though its been a long tome since I looked at these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Images before a certain date were lost in an intrusion.  The datasets are available, do you want them?  Normally the PAF is a guide to the lag, though its been a long tome since I looked at these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Galkowski</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/#comment-13608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Galkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=107#comment-13608</guid>
		<description>Where are the charts? Do the charts say which lags are used? A lag of 1 is often used, but that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s always reasonable?  Are the data sets available? Tried partial autocorrelation functions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are the charts? Do the charts say which lags are used? A lag of 1 is often used, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s always reasonable?  Are the data sets available? Tried partial autocorrelation functions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John G. Bell</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/#comment-5878</link>
		<dc:creator>John G. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=107#comment-5878</guid>
		<description>Is it true that some slopes are favored in CRU and J98?  If so, that doesn&#039;t seem to be the case in BJ01.  The slopes in BJ01&#039;s plot seem to be more random.  If this obsevation is correct, why would the CRU plot behave this way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it true that some slopes are favored in CRU and J98?  If so, that doesn&#8217;t seem to be the case in BJ01.  The slopes in BJ01&#8242;s plot seem to be more random.  If this obsevation is correct, why would the CRU plot behave this way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John G. Bell</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/#comment-6198</link>
		<dc:creator>John G. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=107#comment-6198</guid>
		<description>Is it true that some slopes are favored in CRU and J98?  If so, that doesn&#039;t seem to be the case in BJ01.  The slopes in BJ01&#039;s plot seem to be more random.  If this obsevation is correct, why would the CRU plot behave this way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it true that some slopes are favored in CRU and J98?  If so, that doesn&#8217;t seem to be the case in BJ01.  The slopes in BJ01&#8242;s plot seem to be more random.  If this obsevation is correct, why would the CRU plot behave this way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/#comment-5877</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=107#comment-5877</guid>
		<description>That is what you would look into.  It could be wavelet analysis but I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is what you would look into.  It could be wavelet analysis but I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/#comment-6197</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=107#comment-6197</guid>
		<description>That is what you would look into.  It could be wavelet analysis but I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is what you would look into.  It could be wavelet analysis but I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John G. Bell</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/#comment-5876</link>
		<dc:creator>John G. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=107#comment-5876</guid>
		<description>MJ03 and Mob05 have the circular patterns in them, correct?  1st plot on 2nd row and last plot on 3rd row.  Is it possible to determine what steps in MJo3 and Mob05 inject this sort of pattern into your plots?  Presumably they, (MJ03 &amp; Mob05), share some method(s) not found in the others?  Would you consider this to be an artifact of their process and not something resulting from their selection of data?

I am no mathematician and apologize in advance if these questions are nonsense or have trivial answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MJ03 and Mob05 have the circular patterns in them, correct?  1st plot on 2nd row and last plot on 3rd row.  Is it possible to determine what steps in MJo3 and Mob05 inject this sort of pattern into your plots?  Presumably they, (MJ03 &amp; Mob05), share some method(s) not found in the others?  Would you consider this to be an artifact of their process and not something resulting from their selection of data?</p>
<p>I am no mathematician and apologize in advance if these questions are nonsense or have trivial answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John G. Bell</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/#comment-6196</link>
		<dc:creator>John G. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=107#comment-6196</guid>
		<description>MJ03 and Mob05 have the circular patterns in them, correct?  1st plot on 2nd row and last plot on 3rd row.  Is it possible to determine what steps in MJo3 and Mob05 inject this sort of pattern into your plots?  Presumably they, (MJ03 &amp; Mob05), share some method(s) not found in the others?  Would you consider this to be an artifact of their process and not something resulting from their selection of data?

I am no mathematician and apologize in advance if these questions are nonsense or have trivial answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MJ03 and Mob05 have the circular patterns in them, correct?  1st plot on 2nd row and last plot on 3rd row.  Is it possible to determine what steps in MJo3 and Mob05 inject this sort of pattern into your plots?  Presumably they, (MJ03 &amp; Mob05), share some method(s) not found in the others?  Would you consider this to be an artifact of their process and not something resulting from their selection of data?</p>
<p>I am no mathematician and apologize in advance if these questions are nonsense or have trivial answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/2000-years-surface-temperatures-time-series-lag-plot/#comment-5875</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=107#comment-5875</guid>
		<description>Good suggestion John.  I will try it when I go in tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good suggestion John.  I will try it when I go in tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

