Comments on: Australian Temperature Records in Question

By: Giant Spiders and more manmade "Global Warming" nonsense! - Page 4 - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums

Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:52:57 +0000

[...] C per 100 years, and the High Quality state trend is 0.83C. That's a warming bias of 133%!" Niche Modeling Australian Temperature Records in Question and # FOIAdocumentsHARRY_READ_ME.txtgetting seriously fed up with the state of the Australian [...]

By: davids99us

davids99us — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:40:09 +0000

Good question. Has anyone seen a detailed report of the provenance of all these data?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:40:00 +0000

Good question. Has anyone seen a detailed report of the provenance of all these data?

By: ugg boots

ugg boots — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:57:24 +0000

"Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the write's unique point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can air jordan 20 go those sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally

By: ugg boots

ugg boots — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:57:00 +0000

By: slimething

slimething — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:28:19 +0000

Which does GHCN receive? Is it considered “raw” data?

By: slimething

slimething — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:28:00 +0000

Which does GHCN receive? Is it considered “raw” data?

By: Tweets that mention Niche Modeling Â» Australian Temperature Records in Question -- Topsy.com

Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:03:45 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Truth News Australia. Truth News Australia said: Australian temperature records in question http://is.gd/dbYtI [...]

By: Australian Temperature Records in Question | Sovereign Independent

Australian Temperature Records in Question | Sovereign Independent — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:08:08 +0000

[...] Source [...]

By: davids99us

davids99us — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:36:42 +0000

Like you my first impulse is to go right back to the beginning, and for that reason its been too big a job and haven't started, except for looking at Toorok etc. But Ken has just averaged the maxima and minima as provided and found a big bias against the mean, it seems. You dont need to find all the biases, just one big bias like that is enough to justify a major reanalysis, I feel.