<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cases of Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/</link>
	<description>The Power of Numeracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidGaffaney</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidGaffaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2415#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>There is very little in the world of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blinddateuncensored.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blind date uncensored&lt;/a&gt; that has been the butt of more jokes, and the source of more fear than the blind date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is very little in the world of <a href="http://www.blinddateuncensored.net/" rel="nofollow">blind date uncensored</a> that has been the butt of more jokes, and the source of more fear than the blind date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Short</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Short</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2415#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>A new reference work regarding the climate change debate: &quot;Climate Change Reconsidered&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nipccreport.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nipccreport.org/&lt;/a&gt; The full text may be downloaded from:&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heartland.org/publications/NIPCC%2520report/PDFs/NIPCC%2520Final.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.heartland.org/publications/NIPCC%20r...&lt;/a&gt;for free or purchased in paperback form for US$154.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new reference work regarding the climate change debate: &#8220;Climate Change Reconsidered&#8221;<a href="http://www.nipccreport.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nipccreport.org/</a> The full text may be downloaded from:<a href="http://www.heartland.org/publications/NIPCC%2520report/PDFs/NIPCC%2520Final.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.heartland.org/publications/NIPCC%20r&#8230;</a>for free or purchased in paperback form for US$154.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Short</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/#comment-11198</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Short</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2415#comment-11198</guid>
		<description>A new reference work regarding the climate change debate: &quot;Climate Change Reconsidered&quot;

http://www.nipccreport.org/ 

The full text may be downloaded from:
http://www.heartland.org/publications/NIPCC%20report/PDFs/NIPCC%20Final.pdf
for free or purchased in paperback form for US$154.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new reference work regarding the climate change debate: &#8220;Climate Change Reconsidered&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nipccreport.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nipccreport.org/</a> </p>
<p>The full text may be downloaded from:<br />
<a href="http://www.heartland.org/publications/NIPCC%20report/PDFs/NIPCC%20Final.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.heartland.org/publications/NIPCC%20report/PDFs/NIPCC%20Final.pdf</a><br />
for free or purchased in paperback form for US$154.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2415#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>How about being both a member of the Australian Greens and skeptical of CAGW...yep, I am now officially outed! Was once a vitriolic warmer convinced all those evil deniers were spawn of the devil himself. As I get older I am coming to more fully understand that holding onto beliefs too tightly often leads to one making an arse out of oneself.  Still vote green - unless there is an independent who charms me - but not active in the party anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about being both a member of the Australian Greens and skeptical of CAGW&#8230;yep, I am now officially outed! Was once a vitriolic warmer convinced all those evil deniers were spawn of the devil himself. As I get older I am coming to more fully understand that holding onto beliefs too tightly often leads to one making an arse out of oneself.  Still vote green &#8211; unless there is an independent who charms me &#8211; but not active in the party anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/#comment-11182</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2415#comment-11182</guid>
		<description>How about being both a member of the Australian Greens and skeptical of CAGW...yep, I am now officially outed! Was once a vitriolic warmer convinced all those evil deniers were spawn of the devil himself. As I get older I am coming to more fully understand that holding onto beliefs too tightly often leads to one making an arse out of oneself.  Still vote green - unless there is an independent who charms me - but not active in the party anymore. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about being both a member of the Australian Greens and skeptical of CAGW&#8230;yep, I am now officially outed! Was once a vitriolic warmer convinced all those evil deniers were spawn of the devil himself. As I get older I am coming to more fully understand that holding onto beliefs too tightly often leads to one making an arse out of oneself.  Still vote green &#8211; unless there is an independent who charms me &#8211; but not active in the party anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnkat</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2415#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>I am a Right Winger in San Francisco. I can&#039;t think of any Right Wingers I know, here or on the net, who believe in AGW.I have run into a few, very few, lefties who don&#039;t.Several of those who don&#039;t still want the agenda to be pushed forward for our own good!!!I should mention that I also know a few Republicans who think they are Right Wing who AREN&#039;T!!! They voted for AHHHHHNULD!!!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Right Winger in San Francisco. I can&#039;t think of any Right Wingers I know, here or on the net, who believe in AGW.I have run into a few, very few, lefties who don&#039;t.Several of those who don&#039;t still want the agenda to be pushed forward for our own good!!!I should mention that I also know a few Republicans who think they are Right Wing who AREN&#039;T!!! They voted for AHHHHHNULD!!!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnkat</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/#comment-11134</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2415#comment-11134</guid>
		<description>I am a Right Winger in San Francisco. I can&#039;t think of any Right Wingers I know, here or on the net, who believe in AGW.

I have run into a few, very few, lefties who don&#039;t.

Several of those who don&#039;t still want the agenda to be pushed forward for our own good!!!

I should mention that I also know a few Republicans who think they are Right Wing who AREN&#039;T!!! They voted for AHHHHHNULD!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Right Winger in San Francisco. I can&#8217;t think of any Right Wingers I know, here or on the net, who believe in AGW.</p>
<p>I have run into a few, very few, lefties who don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Several of those who don&#8217;t still want the agenda to be pushed forward for our own good!!!</p>
<p>I should mention that I also know a few Republicans who think they are Right Wing who AREN&#8217;T!!! They voted for AHHHHHNULD!!!</p>
<p>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jae</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>jae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2415#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I am really curious about this relationship, also.  I&#039;ll bet you don&#039;t get many replies.  I try to look at both sides of issues (I really do!), and on the CO2 issue I cannot for the life of me see any scientific evidence of an AGW problem stemming from CO2 (models are NOT evidence, and that&#039;s all there is, really).  IMHO, a person HAS to possess a type of ideological or religious-type bias in order to support anything but a possible minor effect of CO2.  And that type of bias doesn&#039;t come from the conservative side of the aisle.I know, it still IS possible that I&#039;m the blind one :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I am really curious about this relationship, also.  I&#039;ll bet you don&#039;t get many replies.  I try to look at both sides of issues (I really do!), and on the CO2 issue I cannot for the life of me see any scientific evidence of an AGW problem stemming from CO2 (models are NOT evidence, and that&#039;s all there is, really).  IMHO, a person HAS to possess a type of ideological or religious-type bias in order to support anything but a possible minor effect of CO2.  And that type of bias doesn&#039;t come from the conservative side of the aisle.I know, it still IS possible that I&#039;m the blind one <img src='http://landshape.org/enm/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jae</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/#comment-11125</link>
		<dc:creator>jae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2415#comment-11125</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I am really curious about this relationship, also.  I&#039;ll bet you don&#039;t get many replies.  I try to look at both sides of issues (I really do!), and on the CO2 issue I cannot for the life of me see any scientific evidence of an AGW problem stemming from CO2 (models are NOT evidence, and that&#039;s all there is, really).  IMHO, a person HAS to possess a type of ideological or religious-type bias in order to support anything but a possible minor effect of CO2.  And that type of bias doesn&#039;t come from the conservative side of the aisle.

I know, it still IS possible that I&#039;m the blind one :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I am really curious about this relationship, also.  I&#8217;ll bet you don&#8217;t get many replies.  I try to look at both sides of issues (I really do!), and on the CO2 issue I cannot for the life of me see any scientific evidence of an AGW problem stemming from CO2 (models are NOT evidence, and that&#8217;s all there is, really).  IMHO, a person HAS to possess a type of ideological or religious-type bias in order to support anything but a possible minor effect of CO2.  And that type of bias doesn&#8217;t come from the conservative side of the aisle.</p>
<p>I know, it still IS possible that I&#8217;m the blind one <img src='http://landshape.org/enm/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davids99us</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cases-of-global-warming/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>davids99us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2415#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to hear from left-wingers who are AGW skeptics, and right-wingers who are pro-AGW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to hear from left-wingers who are AGW skeptics, and right-wingers who are pro-AGW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

