Comments on: Climategate http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/ The Power of Numeracy Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Niche Modeling » Happy Birthday Climategate! http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/#comment-13115 Niche Modeling » Happy Birthday Climategate! Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:34:58 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3289#comment-13115 [...] remember where I was when I heard about it.” My first post a few days later was entitled Climategate. More was done in Climategate than in all the rebuttals of climate science alarmism that have been [...] [...] remember where I was when I heard about it.” My first post a few days later was entitled Climategate. More was done in Climategate than in all the rebuttals of climate science alarmism that have been [...]

]]> By: http://test.com http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/#comment-1006 http://test.com Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:49:53 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3289#comment-1006 <strong>test...</strong> DIuQOt0 | test ... test…

DIuQOt0 | test …

]]> By: davids99us http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/#comment-1007 davids99us Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:04:43 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3289#comment-1007 I agree. The standards portrayed in the emails are much lower thanaccepted professional standards in my experience. I agree. The standards portrayed in the emails are much lower thanaccepted professional standards in my experience.

]]> By: Anonymous http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/#comment-12071 Anonymous Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:04:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3289#comment-12071 I agree. The standards portrayed in the emails are much lower than accepted professional standards in my experience. I agree. The standards portrayed in the emails are much lower than
accepted professional standards in my experience.

]]> By: davids99us http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/#comment-1005 davids99us Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:04:43 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3289#comment-1005 I agree. The standards portrayed in the emails are much lower thanaccepted professional standards in my experience. I agree. The standards portrayed in the emails are much lower thanaccepted professional standards in my experience.

]]> By: Hank Henry http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/#comment-12070 Hank Henry Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:10:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3289#comment-12070 I am coming around to the thinking that scientists can't be trusted with the numbers. That the work should be in the hands of engineers or professional modelers (if such a thing exists) who are willing to stake their (or their firms) professional reputation on their workmanship. Professionals who will document their work with something more substantial than strings of heavily footnoted scientific papers, and who will make realistic, honest estimates of uncertainties and inaccuracies. The thing that the IPCC report and the Technical Support Document of the EPA lacks is the name of professionals staking their personal reputation on the workmanship of the product. You can tell by the behaviors revealed in the emails that these are not people with much at stake personally. They all think they have secure jobs and are free to let juvenile mentality rule their behavior and attitudes because they have the protection of a university or a government agency. I am coming around to the thinking that scientists can’t be trusted with the numbers. That the work should be in the hands of engineers or professional modelers (if such a thing exists) who are willing to stake their (or their firms) professional reputation on their workmanship. Professionals who will document their work with something more substantial than strings of heavily footnoted scientific papers, and who will make realistic, honest estimates of uncertainties and inaccuracies. The thing that the IPCC report and the Technical Support Document of the EPA lacks is the name of professionals staking their personal reputation on the workmanship of the product. You can tell by the behaviors revealed in the emails that these are not people with much at stake personally. They all think they have secure jobs and are free to let juvenile mentality rule their behavior and attitudes because they have the protection of a university or a government agency.

]]> By: Hank Henry http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/#comment-1004 Hank Henry Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:10:23 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3289#comment-1004 I am coming around to the thinking that scientists can't be trusted with the numbers. That the work should be in the hands of engineers or professional modelers (if such a thing exists) who are willing to stake their (or their firms) professional reputation on their workmanship. Professionals who will document their work with something more substantial than strings of heavily footnoted scientific papers, and who will make realistic, honest estimates of uncertainties and inaccuracies. The thing that the IPCC report and the Technical Support Document of the EPA lacks is the name of professionals staking their personal reputation on the workmanship of the product. You can tell by the behaviors revealed in the emails that these are not people with much at stake personally. They all think they have secure jobs and are free to let juvenile mentality rule their behavior and attitudes because they have the protection of a university or a government agency. I am coming around to the thinking that scientists can't be trusted with the numbers. That the work should be in the hands of engineers or professional modelers (if such a thing exists) who are willing to stake their (or their firms) professional reputation on their workmanship. Professionals who will document their work with something more substantial than strings of heavily footnoted scientific papers, and who will make realistic, honest estimates of uncertainties and inaccuracies. The thing that the IPCC report and the Technical Support Document of the EPA lacks is the name of professionals staking their personal reputation on the workmanship of the product. You can tell by the behaviors revealed in the emails that these are not people with much at stake personally. They all think they have secure jobs and are free to let juvenile mentality rule their behavior and attitudes because they have the protection of a university or a government agency.

]]> By: Will http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/#comment-12023 Will Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:29:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3289#comment-12023 THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION We have been given a powerful tool in the form of GlimateGate. It now has a name and has the potential to get a life of its own. So if the mains stream media is not going to report on this then let us use the social Facebook and emails to spread the news. Send the following two YouTube videos to two people that you know and ask them to send it onto at least 2 others. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu_ok37HDuE And http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk If you have a Facebook page post the two links. Will THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION
We have been given a powerful tool in the form of GlimateGate.
It now has a name and has the potential to get a life of its own.
So if the mains stream media is not going to report on this then let us use the social Facebook and emails to spread the news.
Send the following two YouTube videos to two people that you know and ask them to send it onto at least 2 others.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu_ok37HDuE
And
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk

If you have a Facebook page post the two links.

Will

]]> By: Will http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/#comment-1003 Will Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:29:17 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3289#comment-1003 THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION We have been given a powerful tool in the form of GlimateGate.It now has a name and has the potential to get a life of its own.So if the mains stream media is not going to report on this then let us use the social Facebook and emails to spread the news.Send the following two YouTube videos to two people that you know and ask them to send it onto at least 2 others.<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu_ok37HDuE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu_ok37HDuE</a>And <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk</a>If you have a Facebook page post the two links.Will THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION We have been given a powerful tool in the form of GlimateGate.It now has a name and has the potential to get a life of its own.So if the mains stream media is not going to report on this then let us use the social Facebook and emails to spread the news.Send the following two YouTube videos to two people that you know and ask them to send it onto at least 2 others.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu_ok37HDuEAnd http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVkIf you have a Facebook page post the two links.Will

]]> By: magellan http://landshape.org/enm/climategate/#comment-12022 magellan Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:54:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3289#comment-12022 David, this fits with what you said earlier concerning stacking the review panel to prevent dissenting research: http://www.heartland.org/full/26365/Galileo_Silenced_Again_.html Note the date is Nov 13, prior to the Climategate revelation. Does anyone doubt there was collusion to prevent Soon et al from proceeding? The air wreaks with the stench of AGW thuggery. David, this fits with what you said earlier concerning stacking the review panel to prevent dissenting research:

http://www.heartland.org/full/26365/Galileo_Silenced_Again_.html

Note the date is Nov 13, prior to the Climategate revelation. Does anyone doubt there was collusion to prevent Soon et al from proceeding? The air wreaks with the stench of AGW thuggery.

]]>