Comments for Niche Modeling

Comment on CSIRO and BoM Report by kuhnkat

kuhnkat — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:58:21 +0000

Nick,

are you saying they can't fund enough data gathering and research so they shouldn't be making statements, or, they can't afford to hire decent climate personnel??

Either way it would appear to support David's direction.

Comment on Independent Confirmation of Beenstock’s Theory by davids99us

davids99us — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:59:19 +0000

Interesting thought on the physical basis for I(2).

Comment on Independent Confirmation of Beenstock’s Theory by DavidLHagen

DavidLHagen — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:45:37 +0000

On the significance of dGHG, if CO2 is dominated by ocean temperature T via Clausius-Clapeyron, then wouldn't dCO2/dt vary with dT/dt, which in turn would vary with heat/cooling rate, ie solar driver such as discussed by Scafetta, including TSI, cosmic ray/cloud albedo, orbital changes etc. See:
Nicola Scafetta's on evidence for solar & orbital drivers.

Note Scafetta provides further evidence of the 60 year cycle.

Comment on CSIRO and BoM Report by Nick Stokes

Nick Stokes — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:48:22 +0000

Only a tiny fraction of CSIRO's budget goes to climate research. And none goes to fraud.

Comment on Cointegration Summary by Jan Pompe

Jan Pompe — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:29:24 +0000

Nick the vapour pressure of water is very much related to the air temperature. Water can't hang around too long where the air is thin an cold and that is why it is dry. The cold is also why it's dry on the poles.

Ha any one really considered that his low SH and RH at higher altitudes is having an effect on the worlds glaciers?

I thing it would be.

Comment on CSIRO and BoM Report by twawki

twawki — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:57:17 +0000

Between them they consume over a billion dollars in taxpayers money ever year just to perpetrate climate fraud!

Comment on CSIRO and BoM Report by CSIRO and BOM propaganda continues « TWAWKI

CSIRO and BOM propaganda continues « TWAWKI — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:53:58 +0000

[...] The CSIRO calls this proof, CSIRO and BOM lies [...]

Comment on CSIRO and BoM Report by davids99us

davids99us — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:10:24 +0000

A 13% increase is not “relatively stable”.

Comment on CSIRO and BoM Report by Nick Stokes

Nick Stokes — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:06:53 +0000

This is nitpicky. The full sentence was:
While total rainfall on the Australian continent has been relatively stable, the geographic distribution of rainfall has
changed significantly over the past 50 years.

The point they were making is that it's up in the north, down in the south. Relative to those changes, 6.33 mm/decade is relatively stable.

Comment on Cointegration Summary by Nick Stokes

Nick Stokes — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:55:35 +0000

Stratospheric WV is different. It's very dry anyway, so there isn't really an issue of being able to “hold” water. And the water doesn't much come from below by diffusion etc. The main sources are oxidation of methane, and nowadays, airliners.