<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cosmic rays, cloud condensation nuclei and clouds â€“ a reassessment using MODIS data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://landshape.org/enm/cosmic-rays-cloud-condensation-nuclei-and-clouds-%e2%80%93-a-reassessment-using-modi-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cosmic-rays-cloud-condensation-nuclei-and-clouds-%e2%80%93-a-reassessment-using-modi-data/</link>
	<description>The Power of Numeracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jae</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cosmic-rays-cloud-condensation-nuclei-and-clouds-%e2%80%93-a-reassessment-using-modi-data/#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>jae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1971#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>&quot;Kristjansson and Co have wiped out obvious strong correlations in their data for the shorter term Forbush events, with the device of â€˜adjustments for autocorrelationâ€™, and covered their tracks with a inadequate description of methodology that makes replication impossible.&quot;

Hmm, as shown also at CA, this seems to be a common &quot;technique&quot; in climate science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Kristjansson and Co have wiped out obvious strong correlations in their data for the shorter term Forbush events, with the device of â€˜adjustments for autocorrelationâ€™, and covered their tracks with a inadequate description of methodology that makes replication impossible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmm, as shown also at CA, this seems to be a common &#8220;technique&#8221; in climate science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jae</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cosmic-rays-cloud-condensation-nuclei-and-clouds-%e2%80%93-a-reassessment-using-modi-data/#comment-10701</link>
		<dc:creator>jae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1971#comment-10701</guid>
		<description>&quot;Kristjansson and Co have wiped out obvious strong correlations in their data for the shorter term Forbush events, with the device of ‘adjustments for autocorrelation’, and covered their tracks with a inadequate description of methodology that makes replication impossible.&quot;

Hmm, as shown also at CA, this seems to be a common &quot;technique&quot; in climate science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Kristjansson and Co have wiped out obvious strong correlations in their data for the shorter term Forbush events, with the device of ‘adjustments for autocorrelation’, and covered their tracks with a inadequate description of methodology that makes replication impossible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmm, as shown also at CA, this seems to be a common &#8220;technique&#8221; in climate science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cosmic-rays-cloud-condensation-nuclei-and-clouds-%e2%80%93-a-reassessment-using-modi-data/#comment-2120</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1971#comment-2120</guid>
		<description>Done.  Thanks for the alert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done.  Thanks for the alert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cosmic-rays-cloud-condensation-nuclei-and-clouds-%e2%80%93-a-reassessment-using-modi-data/#comment-10700</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1971#comment-10700</guid>
		<description>Done.  Thanks for the alert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done.  Thanks for the alert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter c</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cosmic-rays-cloud-condensation-nuclei-and-clouds-%e2%80%93-a-reassessment-using-modi-data/#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>peter c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1971#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>Can you fix the link &#039;Reply to Lockwood ...&#039;? Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you fix the link &#8216;Reply to Lockwood &#8230;&#8217;? Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter c</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cosmic-rays-cloud-condensation-nuclei-and-clouds-%e2%80%93-a-reassessment-using-modi-data/#comment-10699</link>
		<dc:creator>peter c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1971#comment-10699</guid>
		<description>Can you fix the link &#039;Reply to Lockwood ...&#039;? Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you fix the link &#8216;Reply to Lockwood &#8230;&#8217;? Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmic rays, cloud condensation nuclei and clouds â€“ a reassessment using MODIS data</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/cosmic-rays-cloud-condensation-nuclei-and-clouds-%e2%80%93-a-reassessment-using-modi-data/#comment-2118</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmic rays, cloud condensation nuclei and clouds â€“ a reassessment using MODIS data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1971#comment-2118</guid>
		<description>[...] Random Feed wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptForex Candlesticks Made Easy!Converts At 8.41% (1:12). Get Affiliate Promo Tools At Http://www.forexcandlesticksmadeeasy.com/aff.php Related: Forex, Fx, Currency, Currencies, Trading, Investment, Trader, Make Money, Candlestick, Stock, Make Money, Finance, Fibonacci, Chart. How To Become A Ticket Broker.Where Did All The Tickets Go?Steve Short sent me this curious paper. Cosmic rays, cloud condensation nuclei and clouds â€“ a reassessment using MODIS data by J. E. Kristjansson, C. W. Stjern, F. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Random Feed wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptForex Candlesticks Made Easy!Converts At 8.41% (1:12). Get Affiliate Promo Tools At Http://www.forexcandlesticksmadeeasy.com/aff.php Related: Forex, Fx, Currency, Currencies, Trading, Investment, Trader, Make Money, Candlestick, Stock, Make Money, Finance, Fibonacci, Chart. How To Become A Ticket Broker.Where Did All The Tickets Go?Steve Short sent me this curious paper. Cosmic rays, cloud condensation nuclei and clouds â€“ a reassessment using MODIS data by J. E. Kristjansson, C. W. Stjern, F. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

