David Evans , aka ‘rocket scientist‘, shared his progression from a believer in anthropogenic global warming (AGW) to skeptic in response to new evidence (longer article here). Bayesian updating is a way of modeling rational changes of mind. I want see if DE is a rational, thinking person. Dr. Jim Peacock, Chief Scientist of Australia, immediate past President of the Australian Academy of Science and a Fellow of the Royal Society of London thinks not. Using the evidence presented in his article, and a very simple Bayesian updating system, we can model the changing probabilities of AGW in DE’s mind. Bayesian updating can get very complicated, but I am going to show a very simple way of simulating it.

The only rigorous relationship I am going to show is Bayes’ Theorem named after the British cleric Thomas Bayes in “An Essay Toward Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances” (Bayes 1764). Bayes’ Theorem relates the “direct” probability of a hypothesis given evidence P(H|E), with the “inverse” probability of the evidence given the hypothesis, P(E|H), the evidence P(E) and the prior P(H).

P(H|E) = P(E|H)P(H)/P(E)

As DE tells it, prior to his conversion:

*The evidence was not conclusive, but why wait until we were certain when it appeared we needed to act quickly? Soon government and the scientific community were working together and lots of science research jobs were created. We scientists had political support, the ear of government, big budgets, and we felt fairly important and useful (well, I did anyway). It was great. We were working to save the planet.*

P(H) is called the prior probability of the hypothesis. DE’s motivation for working on global warming, as stated in the first paragraph above, was basically self interest. In other words he was in some sense economically rational, and he was uncommitted on AGW. The Bayesan term for this is an uninformed prior, expressed as a 50/50 chance of AGW vs. not AGW. We write this as a matrix (0.5,0.5) where the first place is the probability of AGW and the second is the probability of not AGW. DE goes on:

*But since 1999 new evidence has seriously weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming, and by 2007 the evidence was pretty conclusive that carbon played only a minor role and was not the main cause of the recent global warming. As Lord Keynes famously said, “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?”*

P(E|H) is the probability of evidence given the hypothesis. His first piece of evidence is:

1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.

The probability of seeing a greenhouse signature given AGW must be greater 0.5. But given all the noise in the climate system the probability of seeing a signature is not 1 either. Lets say that P(E1|H), the probability of seeing a greenhouse signature given AGW is 0.75, and write the evidence that we have not seen AGW as the matrix (0.25,0.75).

Now we could try to estimate the P(E1) the probability of a greenhouse signature and use Bayes Theorem to calculate P(H|E1) the probability of AGW given the evidence that no signature has been found, but we would have to estimate P(E1), and I am not sure how to do that. Besides there is a simpler way. Because probabilities sum to one, we can simulate the updating of probability of AGW due to the evidence of lack of greenhouse signature by multiplying the matrices and then normalizing, i.e.

(0.5,0.5).(0.25,0.75) = (0.25,0.75)

Thus the evidence reduces the original probability of AGW of 0.5 to 0.25. The same can be done for the other pieces of evidence.

*2. [T]heory suggests that carbon emissions should raise temperatures (though by how much is hotly disputed) but there are no observations by anyone that implicate carbon emissions as a significant cause of the recent global warming.*

P(E2|H) The probability that carbon dioxide could be the cause of any given warming depends on how many other causes of warming there are. Lets say that historically, carbon dioxide has caused 50% of warmings, or causes 50% of the warmth of warming. Then P(E2|H) is (0.5,0.5). This says that the theory of global warming due to greenhouse gases (AGW) provides no effective evidence to support AGW as a cause. If CO2 was the cause of warmings 90% of the time say, then (0.9,0.1) would produce considerable support from this evidence when multiplied with the prior.

*3. The satellites that measure the world’s temperature all say that the warming trend ended in 2001, and that the temperature has dropped about 0.6C in the past year (to the temperature of 1980).*

Here we can estimate P(E3|H) with some Monte Carlo simulations to find the frequency of decadal temperature increases and decreases when the globe is warming. Say that temperatures over a ten year period are increasing 75% of the time when the earth is warming. Then P(E3|H) => (0.25,0.75).

*4. The new ice cores show that in the past six global warmings over the past half a million years, the temperature rises occurred on average 800 years before the accompanying rise in atmospheric carbon.*

While CO2 lagging temperature does not disprove AGW completely, it does tend to provide some support for the alternative, so my guess is that the probability of lagging CO2 when AGW is true is less than 0.5 and so (0.25,0.75).

Now we use a variation of a Bayesian chain rule to calculate the final probability of the hypothesis that global warming is caused by greenhouse gases given the four pieces of evidence. Below we multiply the prior matrix by the four evidence matrices and normalize the result.

P(H).P(E1|H).P(E1|H).P(E1|H).P(E1|H)

=> (0.5,0.5).(0.25,0.75).(0.5,0.5).(0.25,0.75).(0.25,0.75)

=> (0.0039, 0.1055)/0.1094

=> (0.036,0.964)

That is, the probability of AGW given the evidences E1-4 is 0.036 or 3.6%. This is low enough to lead to rejection of a hypothesis at the standard significance level of 95%. In this very rough model, the changing of David Evan’s mind is a rational outcome of updated probabilities in response to new evidence, leading to a formalized decision to dismiss AGW when it reached a high enough threshold of improbability. I think Dr. Jim Peacock, Chief Scientist of Australia, owes David Evans — ‘rocket scientist’ — an apology.

Pingback: Sun Max zonnestudio Solarium Amsterdam Nieuwezijds Voorburgwal 78 1012 SE Amsterdam 020-330-6010 for fast tanning

Pingback: click here to rent your spare room

Pingback: city gate showflat

Pingback: sam waltonman

Pingback: the crest condo

Pingback: pro locksmith

Pingback: iherb coupon code

Pingback: iherb coupons

Pingback: iherb coupon

Pingback: for more information

Pingback: Dentist Peoria Az

Pingback: real estate rentals

Pingback: Info

Pingback: buy cialis

Pingback: Best examiner

Pingback: Footprint

Pingback: premature ejaculation treatment nhs

Pingback: Company

Pingback: Empowering

Pingback: News

Pingback: Van hall tapes the original phone humor

Pingback: GOPRO DEALER INDIA

Pingback: Solutions

Pingback: Tech

Pingback: cheat tool

Pingback: bare sex in

Pingback: Advogado familia

Pingback: Start

Pingback: graphic design

Pingback: Health

Pingback: Top mediums van parastars voor duidelijk advies

Pingback: Boquete Homes For Sale

Pingback: Finance

Pingback: clean

Pingback: prostrate

Pingback: Vidify

Pingback: rebelmouse.com/somanabolicmusclemaximizerrr

Pingback: Liberty

Pingback: private labels skin care

Pingback: leeds builders

Pingback: Helderzienden online: Live helderziende - Heldervoelende helderziende

Pingback: hairy anus

Pingback: mark cobb

Pingback: buying gold from africa

Pingback: Websiteoptimalisatie/websiteoptimaliseren

Pingback: workout obsession

Pingback: Business

Pingback: the best weight loss pills

Pingback: iherb coupon

Pingback: iherb promo code

Pingback: iherb coupons

Pingback: Camp

Pingback: kolorowanki do druku

Pingback: Nice Côte d'Azur

Pingback: Technology

Pingback: nutrasilver

Pingback: this site

Pingback: buy fifa 14 coins

Pingback: Miami bankruptcy lawyer

Pingback: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=air.com.mysweet.dog

Pingback: Home

Pingback: abstract

Pingback: Diindolylmethane

Pingback: Fashion

Pingback: water ionizer

Pingback: led bulbs

Pingback: dissecting microscope

Pingback: online cigars

Pingback: slotomania coins free

Pingback: Austin Outdoor Kitchen Remodeling

Pingback: Financial

Pingback: cracked accounts

Pingback: homeowners insurance comparison

Pingback: Car insurance news

Pingback: Movemynt Products

Pingback: low self esteem

Pingback: LINK M88

Pingback: cheap term life insurance

Pingback: carpet cleaning houston

Pingback: kangen water

Pingback: Avis informatif

Pingback: ecig vapor

Pingback: backpacking essentials

Pingback: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLmxxtzubTfluudJfxIelfrhGk_fSw707B

Pingback: Epson

Pingback: paint horse for sale

Pingback: burçlar

Pingback: social media in pueblo

Pingback: harmen tall

Pingback: Attorney 816-524-0404

Pingback: Party Supplies Shop

Pingback: online insurance quote

Pingback: mois

Pingback: Madimo

Pingback: Amddram

Pingback: Legrand cariva

Pingback: Rozwód Wroclaw

Pingback: dzial spadku

Pingback: http://gry-przegladarkowe.net.pl/

Pingback: Infant Toddler Instructor Education Course

Pingback: napedy bram przemyslowych

Pingback: M88

Pingback: dead tree removal conroe

Pingback: Wp Weekend Phoenix

Pingback: hefalimp cardijon

Pingback: hand cleaning facts

Pingback: Green tea

Pingback: this site has good information

Pingback: photography

Pingback: Taxi

Pingback: best zombie movie

Pingback: fajsdgjfashdjfaksjdhkfa

Pingback: find out this here

Pingback: game mods

Pingback: Altieri Gilmore LLP Attorneys

Pingback: skup sprzetu komputerowego Wroclaw

Pingback: elblag noclegi

Pingback: stomatolog wrzesnia

Pingback: water ionizer comparison

Pingback: alkaline ionized water

Pingback: water ionizer comparison

Pingback: wyniki lotto

Pingback: gcsrdsmgkrnggkxrv

Pingback: Girls' Sandals

Pingback: how to get rid of mice

Pingback: blog here

Pingback: annual credit report gov

Pingback: Logistics

Pingback: home & garden

Pingback: you can check here

Pingback: Debat Capres 2014

Pingback: scmrgscvgxrfmgckg

Pingback: Love story in Hindi

Pingback: Cost effective Shopping On-line

Pingback: qzdcgzscbfsdgvvhid

Pingback: Find Out More

Pingback: web site

Pingback: gcrmgskrfhxfsxg

Pingback: Javascript

Pingback: teeth whitening at home fastest

Pingback: get a job at mcdonalds

Pingback: career jobs from home

Pingback: gogol spain

Pingback: check my source

Pingback: how to last longer in bed for men pills

Pingback: noticias

Pingback: breaking news

Pingback: how to wear sizegenetics

Pingback: link

Pingback: seo syracuse

Pingback: online slots

Pingback: the expendables 3 download kickass

Pingback: Entrepreneur

Pingback: free download indian The Expendables 3

Pingback: free The Expendables 3 downloads no sign up

Pingback: sacred 3 trainer

Pingback: lucid dreaming

Pingback: Free Expendables 3

Pingback: download new The Expendables 3

Pingback: download The Expendables 3 free

Pingback: home,

Pingback: downloading The Expendables 3 for free

Pingback: napoleon hill outwitting the devil summary

Pingback: divorce lawyer

Pingback: free downloads The Expendables 3

Pingback: this post

Pingback: medication for premature ejaculation treatment

Pingback: you can try this out

Pingback: salon kosmetyczny Kraków

Pingback: fundraising

Pingback: free online The Expendables 3 no download

Pingback: this content

Pingback: kangen water machine

Pingback: indretningsarkitekt

Pingback: avi The Expendables 3 download

Pingback: DEEP SEEKEING

Pingback: home page

Pingback: how long average man last in bed

Pingback: Ameriplan

Pingback: lighted signs

Pingback: antalya escort

Pingback: billiga sexleksaker

Pingback: arkitekter

Pingback: kargo

Pingback: bhp kraków

Pingback: surgical instruments

Pingback: Chicago burglary attorney

Pingback: Bahamas scuba diving

Pingback: rencontres

Pingback: bad credit home loan Buckhead

Pingback: gambling

Pingback: la printers

Pingback: visit our website

Pingback: Press Release Distribution

Pingback: online shopping for women

Pingback: venus factor review

Pingback: Electric generators

Pingback: Website Design

Pingback: banned commercials

Pingback: buiness health & saftey insurance

Pingback: muslim goat sex

Pingback: prowident

Pingback: michael kors

Pingback: loss of job

Pingback: Eliminate Your Tinnitus Forever In 30-60 Days - Guaranteed!

Pingback: warehouses for rent miami

Pingback: Demir Furniture

Pingback: the lovelady center

Pingback: kaffeevollautomat 1300watt

Pingback: trappen

Pingback: fiverr backlinks

Pingback: soundcloud

Pingback: bollywood gossip

Pingback: mmpr licensed producers mmpr licensed producers

Pingback: jobs

Pingback: $1000 Profit in 30 Minute Proven Binary Trading Strategy

Pingback: Dryer vent cleaning

Pingback: Appliance repair Chicago

Pingback: sports science

Pingback: más información

Pingback: ??δ??

Pingback: Begum Law Group Alex Begum

Pingback: Luxury Watch online auction

Pingback: Ideas

Pingback: mineral foundation

Pingback: rooms

Pingback: Bose SoundLink Mini Review

Pingback: PTCSmarty

Pingback: cheap flights

Pingback: womens police costume