Comments on: Drought Exceptional Circumstances Review http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/ The Power of Numeracy Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Rainfall Drought Index | Niche Modeling http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-4314 Rainfall Drought Index | Niche Modeling Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:39:30 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-4314 [...] as a quick look at the data provided from CSIRO for the Drought Exceptional Circumstances Report, I made density plots (frequency histograms) for the rainfall data over two periods, 1900-2010 and [...] [...] as a quick look at the data provided from CSIRO for the Drought Exceptional Circumstances Report, I made density plots (frequency histograms) for the rainfall data over two periods, 1900-2010 and [...]

]]> By: Niche Modeling » Drought Exceptional Circumstances Report MIA http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-4313 Niche Modeling » Drought Exceptional Circumstances Report MIA Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:18:33 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-4313 [...] admin @ Dought Exceptional Circumstances Review [...] [...] admin @ Dought Exceptional Circumstances Review [...]

]]> By: admin http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-4312 admin Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:53:36 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-4312 Peter, differences in year ranges wouldn't affect it as the data is straight out of the tables. I didn't notice the year ranges were different. The observed value is the first column, the actual observed % area values for 1957-2000. The predicted values are the mean values of the 13 models, the third column. Peter, differences in year ranges wouldn’t affect it as the data is straight out of the tables. I didn’t notice the year ranges were different.

The observed value is the first column, the actual observed % area values for 1957-2000. The predicted values are the mean values of the 13 models, the third column.

]]> By: admin http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-7317 admin Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:53:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-7317 Peter, differences in year ranges wouldn't affect it as the data is straight out of the tables. I didn't notice the year ranges were different. The observed value is the first column, the actual observed % area values for 1957-2000. The predicted values are the mean values of the 13 models, the third column. Peter, differences in year ranges wouldn’t affect it as the data is straight out of the tables. I didn’t notice the year ranges were different.

The observed value is the first column, the actual observed % area values for 1957-2000. The predicted values are the mean values of the 13 models, the third column.

]]> By: Peter Gallagher http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-4311 Peter Gallagher Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:22:14 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-4311 David, Could you explain again what you are doing with the observed value and the 'predicted value'? Where do you get the latter? The table shows 1957-2006 data but you refer to a test of whether the 1957-2000 data fall within the 2sigma range of the models. Is this just a typo? Also, I note that in the report the data ranges (years) are different between the temperature, rainfall and soil-moisture results. Does this affect your analysis? David,

Could you explain again what you are doing with the observed value and the ‘predicted value’? Where do you get the latter?

The table shows 1957-2006 data but you refer to a test of whether the 1957-2000 data fall within the 2sigma range of the models. Is this just a typo?

Also, I note that in the report the data ranges (years) are different between the temperature, rainfall and soil-moisture results. Does this affect your analysis?

]]> By: Peter Gallagher http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-7316 Peter Gallagher Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:22:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/dought-exceptional-circumstances-review/#comment-7316 David, Could you explain again what you are doing with the observed value and the 'predicted value'? Where do you get the latter? The table shows 1957-2006 data but you refer to a test of whether the 1957-2000 data fall within the 2sigma range of the models. Is this just a typo? Also, I note that in the report the data ranges (years) are different between the temperature, rainfall and soil-moisture results. Does this affect your analysis? David,

Could you explain again what you are doing with the observed value and the ‘predicted value’? Where do you get the latter?

The table shows 1957-2006 data but you refer to a test of whether the 1957-2000 data fall within the 2sigma range of the models. Is this just a typo?

Also, I note that in the report the data ranges (years) are different between the temperature, rainfall and soil-moisture results. Does this affect your analysis?

]]>