<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Niche Modeling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://landshape.org/enm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://landshape.org/enm</link>
	<description>The Power of Numeracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Evidence of a Sun-Climate Connection</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-a-sun-climate-connection/</link>
		<comments>http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-a-sun-climate-connection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=6280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bjerknes compensation assumes a constant total poleward energy transport (and an inverse relation between oceanic and atmospheric heat transport fluxes (Bjerknes, 1964)). Contrary to this assumption, there is empirical evidence of a simultaneous increase in poleward oceanic and atmospheric heat transport during the most recent warming period since the mid-1970s (aka the Great Pacific Climate Shift). This paper argues that TSI directly modulates ocean–atmospheric meridional heat transport. Solar Read more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-a-sun-climate-connection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Widening Gap Between Present Global Temperature and IPCC Model Projections</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/the-widening-gap-between-present-global-temperature-and-ipcc-model-projections/</link>
		<comments>http://landshape.org/enm/the-widening-gap-between-present-global-temperature-and-ipcc-model-projections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=6266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An increase in global temperature required to match the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projections is becoming increasingly unlikely. A shift to a mean projected pathway of 3 degrees increase by the end of the century would require an immediate, large, and sustained increase in temperature which seems physically impossible. Global surface temperatures have not increased at all in the last 18 years. The trend over the last few years is even falling slightly. Global temperatures Read more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://landshape.org/enm/the-widening-gap-between-present-global-temperature-and-ipcc-model-projections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q: Where Do Climate Models Fail? A: Almost Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/q-where-do-climate-model-fail-a-almost-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://landshape.org/enm/q-where-do-climate-model-fail-a-almost-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=6255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["How much do I fail thee. Let me count the ways" Ben Santer's latest model/observation comparison paper demonstrates that climate realists were right and climate models exaggerate warming: The multimodel average tropospheric temperature trends are outside the 5–95 percentile range of RSS results at most latitudes. Where do the models fail? 1. Significantly warmer than reality (95% CI) in the lower troposphere at all latitudes, except for the arctic. 2. Significantly warmer Read more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://landshape.org/enm/q-where-do-climate-model-fail-a-almost-everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>East Pacific Region Temperatures: Climate Models Fail Again</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/east-pacific-region-temperatures-climate-models-fail-again/</link>
		<comments>http://landshape.org/enm/east-pacific-region-temperatures-climate-models-fail-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 21:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=6230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Tisdale, author of the awesome book “Who Turned on the Heat?” presented an interesting problem that turns out to be a good application of robust statistical tests called empirical fluctuation processes. Bob notes that sea surface temperature (SST) in a large region of the globe in the Eastern Pacific does not appear to have warmed at all in the last 30 years, in contrast to model simulations (CMIP SST) for that region that show strong warming. The region in question is shown below. The Read more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://landshape.org/enm/east-pacific-region-temperatures-climate-models-fail-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santer: Climate Models are Exaggerating Warming &#8211; We Don&#8217;t Know Why</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/santer-climate-models-are-exaggerating-warming-we-dont-know-why/</link>
		<comments>http://landshape.org/enm/santer-climate-models-are-exaggerating-warming-we-dont-know-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 05:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=6217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Santer's latest model/observation comparison paper in PNAS finally admits what climate realists have been been saying for years -- climate models are exaggerating warming. From the abstract: On average, the models analyzed ... overestimate the warming of the troposphere. Although the precise causes of such differences are unclear... Their figure above shows the massive model fail. The blue and magenta lines are trend of the UAH and RSS satelite temperature observations averaged by Read more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://landshape.org/enm/santer-climate-models-are-exaggerating-warming-we-dont-know-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Cycle 24 peaked? The experimentum crucis begins.</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/solar-cycle-24-peaked-the-experimentum-crucis-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://landshape.org/enm/solar-cycle-24-peaked-the-experimentum-crucis-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Accumulation Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=6208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WSO Polar field strengths - early indicators of solar maximums and minimums - have dived towards zero recently, indicating that its all down from here for solar cycle 24. Polar field reversals can occur within a year of sunspot maximum, but cycle 24 has been so insipid, it would not be surprising if the maximum sunspot number fails to reach the NOAA predicted peak of 90 spots per month, and get no higher than the current 60 spots per month. The peak in solar intensity was predicted Read more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://landshape.org/enm/solar-cycle-24-peaked-the-experimentum-crucis-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AGW Doesn&#8217;t Cointegrate: Beenstock&#8217;s Challenging Analysis Published</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/agw-doesnt-cointegrate-beenstocks-challenging-analysis-published/</link>
		<comments>http://landshape.org/enm/agw-doesnt-cointegrate-beenstocks-challenging-analysis-published/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=6198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Beenstock, Reingewertz, and Paldor paper on lack of cointegration of global temperature with CO2 has been accepted! This is a technical paper that we have been following since 2009 when an unpublished manuscript appeared, rebutting the statistical link between global temperature increase and anthropogenic factors like CO2, and so represents another nail in the coffin of CAGW. The editor praised the work as "challenging" and "needed in our field of work." Does the increase in CO2 concentration Read more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://landshape.org/enm/agw-doesnt-cointegrate-beenstocks-challenging-analysis-published/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still no weakening of the Walker Circulation</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/still-no-weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/</link>
		<comments>http://landshape.org/enm/still-no-weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=6183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time, a weakening of the East-West Pacific overturning circulation – called the Walker circulation – was regarded in climate science as a robust response to anthropogenic global warming. This belief was based on studies in 2006 and 2007 using climate models. Together with a number of El Nino events (that are associated with a weakening of the Walker circulation) the alarm was raised in a string of papers (3-6) that global warming was now impacting the Pacific Ocean and that the Read more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://landshape.org/enm/still-no-weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Circularity and the Hockeystick: coming around again</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/circularity-and-the-hockeystick-coming-around-again/</link>
		<comments>http://landshape.org/enm/circularity-and-the-hockeystick-coming-around-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=6175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent posts at climateaudit and WUWT show that climate scientists Gergis and Karoly were willing to manipulate their study to ensure a hockeystick result in the Southern Hemisphere, and resisted advice from editors of the Journal of Climate to report alternative approaches to establish robustness of their study. The alternative the editors suggested of detrending the data first, revealed that most of the proxies collected in the Gergis study were uncorrelated with temperature, and so would Read more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://landshape.org/enm/circularity-and-the-hockeystick-coming-around-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the problem alarmism, or prestige-seeking?</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/is-the-problem-alarmism-or-prestige-seeking/</link>
		<comments>http://landshape.org/enm/is-the-problem-alarmism-or-prestige-seeking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=6171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all make mistakes. Sometime we exaggerate the risks, and sometimes we foolishly blunder into situations we regret. Climate skeptics often characterize their opponents as 'alarmist'. But is the real problem a tendency for climate scientists to be 'nervous ninnies'? I was intrigued by the recent verdict in the case of the scientists before an Italian court in the aftermath of a fatal earthquake. Roger Pielke Jr. relates that all is not as it seems. There is a popular misconception in circulation Read more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://landshape.org/enm/is-the-problem-alarmism-or-prestige-seeking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
