<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Temperature Change and Geomagnetic Field Intensity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://landshape.org/enm/global-temperature-change-and-geomagnetic-field-intensity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://landshape.org/enm/global-temperature-change-and-geomagnetic-field-intensity/</link>
	<description>The Power of Numeracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnkat</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/global-temperature-change-and-geomagnetic-field-intensity/#comment-2212</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2064#comment-2212</guid>
		<description>Nick,check and insure the studies are comparing apples to apples. I believe at least one of them looked at lower energy particles than what Svensmark considers a factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,check and insure the studies are comparing apples to apples. I believe at least one of them looked at lower energy particles than what Svensmark considers a factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/global-temperature-change-and-geomagnetic-field-intensity/#comment-2211</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2064#comment-2211</guid>
		<description>Some recent studies didn&#039;t find any link between increased cosmic radiation and increased cloud formation.&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7352667.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/73526...&lt;/a&gt;Perhaps geomagnetic field intensity affects global temperature change through a different mechanism.   Until recently, everyone believed that Earth&#039;s magnetic field deflects and protects Earth from solar wind and coronal mass ejections.  But now a new study has found that instead Earth&#039;s magnetic field collects solar wind over a much larger area than Earth&#039;s diameter and slams half of it around Earth&#039;s poles in a sling-shot kind of way with twice the energy of the original solar wind.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941.800-auroras-the-greatest-show-on-earth.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941....&lt;/a&gt;Which means that the amount of energy from the solar wind delivered to Earth&#039;s atmosphere varies with the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun and with the strength of the Earth&#039;s magnetic field.  The stronger the Earth&#039;s magnetic field, the more energy from the solar wind ends up in the Earth&#039;s upper atmosphere.  Which probably gets distributed globally through winds and air circulation. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104.000-earths-protective-shield-is-stealing-our-air.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104....&lt;/a&gt;The solar wind itself might be heating Earth&#039;s atmosphere more or less depending on variations in the strength of Earth&#039;s magnetic field and the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun.  And such variations could cause climate change on Earth, including global warming and the Ice Ages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some recent studies didn&#039;t find any link between increased cosmic radiation and increased cloud formation.<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7352667.stm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/73526" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/73526</a>&#8230;Perhaps geomagnetic field intensity affects global temperature change through a different mechanism.   Until recently, everyone believed that Earth&#039;s magnetic field deflects and protects Earth from solar wind and coronal mass ejections.  But now a new study has found that instead Earth&#039;s magnetic field collects solar wind over a much larger area than Earth&#039;s diameter and slams half of it around Earth&#039;s poles in a sling-shot kind of way with twice the energy of the original solar wind.<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941.800-auroras-the-greatest-show-on-earth.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941</a>&#8230;.Which means that the amount of energy from the solar wind delivered to Earth&#039;s atmosphere varies with the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun and with the strength of the Earth&#039;s magnetic field.  The stronger the Earth&#039;s magnetic field, the more energy from the solar wind ends up in the Earth&#039;s upper atmosphere.  Which probably gets distributed globally through winds and air circulation. <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104.000-earths-protective-shield-is-stealing-our-air.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104</a>&#8230;.The solar wind itself might be heating Earth&#039;s atmosphere more or less depending on variations in the strength of Earth&#039;s magnetic field and the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun.  And such variations could cause climate change on Earth, including global warming and the Ice Ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnkat</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/global-temperature-change-and-geomagnetic-field-intensity/#comment-2210</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2064#comment-2210</guid>
		<description>Nick,check and insure the studies are comparing apples to apples. I believe at least one of them looked at lower energy particles than what Svensmark considers a factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,check and insure the studies are comparing apples to apples. I believe at least one of them looked at lower energy particles than what Svensmark considers a factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnkat</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/global-temperature-change-and-geomagnetic-field-intensity/#comment-11131</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2064#comment-11131</guid>
		<description>Nick,

check and insure the studies are comparing apples to apples. I believe at least one of them looked at lower energy particles than what Svensmark considers a factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>check and insure the studies are comparing apples to apples. I believe at least one of them looked at lower energy particles than what Svensmark considers a factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/global-temperature-change-and-geomagnetic-field-intensity/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2064#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>Some recent studies didn&#039;t find any link between increased cosmic radiation and increased cloud formation.&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7352667.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/73526...&lt;/a&gt;Perhaps geomagnetic field intensity affects global temperature change through a different mechanism.   Until recently, everyone believed that Earth&#039;s magnetic field deflects and protects Earth from solar wind and coronal mass ejections.  But now a new study has found that instead Earth&#039;s magnetic field collects solar wind over a much larger area than Earth&#039;s diameter and slams half of it around Earth&#039;s poles in a sling-shot kind of way with twice the energy of the original solar wind.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941.800-auroras-the-greatest-show-on-earth.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941....&lt;/a&gt;Which means that the amount of energy from the solar wind delivered to Earth&#039;s atmosphere varies with the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun and with the strength of the Earth&#039;s magnetic field.  The stronger the Earth&#039;s magnetic field, the more energy from the solar wind ends up in the Earth&#039;s upper atmosphere.  Which probably gets distributed globally through winds and air circulation. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104.000-earths-protective-shield-is-stealing-our-air.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104....&lt;/a&gt;The solar wind itself might be heating Earth&#039;s atmosphere more or less depending on variations in the strength of Earth&#039;s magnetic field and the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun.  And such variations could cause climate change on Earth, including global warming and the Ice Ages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some recent studies didn&#039;t find any link between increased cosmic radiation and increased cloud formation.<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7352667.stm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/73526" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/73526</a>&#8230;Perhaps geomagnetic field intensity affects global temperature change through a different mechanism.   Until recently, everyone believed that Earth&#039;s magnetic field deflects and protects Earth from solar wind and coronal mass ejections.  But now a new study has found that instead Earth&#039;s magnetic field collects solar wind over a much larger area than Earth&#039;s diameter and slams half of it around Earth&#039;s poles in a sling-shot kind of way with twice the energy of the original solar wind.<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941.800-auroras-the-greatest-show-on-earth.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941</a>&#8230;.Which means that the amount of energy from the solar wind delivered to Earth&#039;s atmosphere varies with the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun and with the strength of the Earth&#039;s magnetic field.  The stronger the Earth&#039;s magnetic field, the more energy from the solar wind ends up in the Earth&#039;s upper atmosphere.  Which probably gets distributed globally through winds and air circulation. <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104.000-earths-protective-shield-is-stealing-our-air.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104</a>&#8230;.The solar wind itself might be heating Earth&#039;s atmosphere more or less depending on variations in the strength of Earth&#039;s magnetic field and the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun.  And such variations could cause climate change on Earth, including global warming and the Ice Ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/global-temperature-change-and-geomagnetic-field-intensity/#comment-11127</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2064#comment-11127</guid>
		<description>Some recent studies didn&#039;t find any link between increased cosmic radiation and increased cloud formation.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7352667.stm

Perhaps geomagnetic field intensity affects global temperature change through a different mechanism.   Until recently, everyone believed that Earth&#039;s magnetic field deflects and protects Earth from solar wind and coronal mass ejections.  But now a new study has found that instead Earth&#039;s magnetic field collects solar wind over a much larger area than Earth&#039;s diameter and slams half of it around Earth&#039;s poles in a sling-shot kind of way with twice the energy of the original solar wind.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941.800-auroras-the-greatest-show-on-earth.html

Which means that the amount of energy from the solar wind delivered to Earth&#039;s atmosphere varies with the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun and with the strength of the Earth&#039;s magnetic field.  The stronger the Earth&#039;s magnetic field, the more energy from the solar wind ends up in the Earth&#039;s upper atmosphere.  Which probably gets distributed globally through winds and air circulation. 
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104.000-earths-protective-shield-is-stealing-our-air.html

The solar wind itself might be heating Earth&#039;s atmosphere more or less depending on variations in the strength of Earth&#039;s magnetic field and the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun.  And such variations could cause climate change on Earth, including global warming and the Ice Ages.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some recent studies didn&#8217;t find any link between increased cosmic radiation and increased cloud formation.<br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7352667.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7352667.stm</a></p>
<p>Perhaps geomagnetic field intensity affects global temperature change through a different mechanism.   Until recently, everyone believed that Earth&#8217;s magnetic field deflects and protects Earth from solar wind and coronal mass ejections.  But now a new study has found that instead Earth&#8217;s magnetic field collects solar wind over a much larger area than Earth&#8217;s diameter and slams half of it around Earth&#8217;s poles in a sling-shot kind of way with twice the energy of the original solar wind.<br />
<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941.800-auroras-the-greatest-show-on-earth.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126941.800-auroras-the-greatest-show-on-earth.html</a></p>
<p>Which means that the amount of energy from the solar wind delivered to Earth&#8217;s atmosphere varies with the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun and with the strength of the Earth&#8217;s magnetic field.  The stronger the Earth&#8217;s magnetic field, the more energy from the solar wind ends up in the Earth&#8217;s upper atmosphere.  Which probably gets distributed globally through winds and air circulation.<br />
<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104.000-earths-protective-shield-is-stealing-our-air.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227104.000-earths-protective-shield-is-stealing-our-air.html</a></p>
<p>The solar wind itself might be heating Earth&#8217;s atmosphere more or less depending on variations in the strength of Earth&#8217;s magnetic field and the amount of solar wind produced by the Sun.  And such variations could cause climate change on Earth, including global warming and the Ice Ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Hissink</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/global-temperature-change-and-geomagnetic-field-intensity/#comment-2208</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Hissink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2064#comment-2208</guid>
		<description>This is not surprising - all magnetic fields are produced by electric currents, and electric currents passing through matter generate heat.

Cosmic rays are also electric currents, (charged particles in motion) so when you decide to think about the problem in terms of electrical engineering, things become easier to explain.

Not so easy is to work out the precise relationship between the geomagnetic field, and the temperature anomalies.

For a start do the temperature anomalies have any relationship to the thermal state of the solid earth underneath them, or are they restricted to the atmosphere?

And what is the connection with clouds?

Remember that it is generallybeleived that its weather that produces the atmosphere electrical phenomena, rather than vice versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not surprising &#8211; all magnetic fields are produced by electric currents, and electric currents passing through matter generate heat.</p>
<p>Cosmic rays are also electric currents, (charged particles in motion) so when you decide to think about the problem in terms of electrical engineering, things become easier to explain.</p>
<p>Not so easy is to work out the precise relationship between the geomagnetic field, and the temperature anomalies.</p>
<p>For a start do the temperature anomalies have any relationship to the thermal state of the solid earth underneath them, or are they restricted to the atmosphere?</p>
<p>And what is the connection with clouds?</p>
<p>Remember that it is generallybeleived that its weather that produces the atmosphere electrical phenomena, rather than vice versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Hissink</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/global-temperature-change-and-geomagnetic-field-intensity/#comment-10782</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Hissink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2064#comment-10782</guid>
		<description>This is not surprising - all magnetic fields are produced by electric currents, and electric currents passing through matter generate heat.

Cosmic rays are also electric currents, (charged particles in motion) so when you decide to think about the problem in terms of electrical engineering, things become easier to explain.

Not so easy is to work out the precise relationship between the geomagnetic field, and the temperature anomalies.

For a start do the temperature anomalies have any relationship to the thermal state of the solid earth underneath them, or are they restricted to the atmosphere?

And what is the connection with clouds?

Remember that it is generallybeleived that its weather that produces the atmosphere electrical phenomena, rather than vice versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not surprising &#8211; all magnetic fields are produced by electric currents, and electric currents passing through matter generate heat.</p>
<p>Cosmic rays are also electric currents, (charged particles in motion) so when you decide to think about the problem in terms of electrical engineering, things become easier to explain.</p>
<p>Not so easy is to work out the precise relationship between the geomagnetic field, and the temperature anomalies.</p>
<p>For a start do the temperature anomalies have any relationship to the thermal state of the solid earth underneath them, or are they restricted to the atmosphere?</p>
<p>And what is the connection with clouds?</p>
<p>Remember that it is generallybeleived that its weather that produces the atmosphere electrical phenomena, rather than vice versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

