I don’t think you were ever equally skeptical about the current mainstream view, neither after you began studying it nor before. (Your studies only strengthened your connection with it probably and I suppose you never approached it critically. In that sense it is pretty much like religion actually if you think about it, but that’s irrelevant for now and I don’t want to anger you. ) What I’m trying to say is that the main reason that you’re so aggressively opposing Miskolczi is because he disagrees with so much that you were indoctrinated with. I’m sure if you were raised by him (i.e. if you were his son) you wouldn’t be in your current position no matter what and where you study. So you’re certainly not biased towards him and it looks probable that the opposite might be the case.

Anyway, it can be that he really is wrong. But it can also be that he sees the world differently than you were taught to see and perhaps unbelievably his vision is more accurate than yours. The point is you’ll never know until you truly understand him. To achieve that, first you must acknowledge the possibility that he may somehow be right. You should completely absorb this fact, it’s essential. Only after that will you be able to invest enough time to try and see the world through his point of view. If you can’t convince yourself to do that (because you think it’s too unlikely or whatever) then you should avoid actively taking a stance. I, for example, don’t really have much clue who’s right, I don’t intend to study Miskolczi’s views. Therefore I’m just observing from outside and not acting as if I know all there is to know. But as far as I can tell you arrived here with a very solid assumption that he is wrong. You should consider reshaping that assumption…and I don’t mean just on the surface. Do it sincerely; begin to act and talk and live like someone who knows that it is absolutely possible that a seemingly incompetent scientist may just be a misunderstood but a pretty competent one.

I don’t think you were ever equally skeptical about the current mainstream view, neither after you began studying it nor before. (Your studies only strengthened your connection with it probably and I suppose you never approached it critically. In that sense it is pretty much like religion actually if you think about it, but that’s irrelevant for now and I don’t want to anger you. ) What I’m trying to say is that the main reason that you’re so aggressively opposing Miskolczi is because he disagrees with so much that you were indoctrinated with. I’m sure if you were raised by him (i.e. if you were his son) you wouldn’t be in your current position no matter what and where you study. So you’re certainly not biased towards him and it looks probable that the opposite might be the case.

Anyway, it can be that he really is wrong. But it can also be that he sees the world differently than you were taught to see and perhaps unbelievably his vision is more accurate than yours. The point is you’ll never know until you truly understand him. To achieve that, first you must acknowledge the possibility that he may somehow be right. You should completely absorb this fact, it’s essential. Only after that will you be able to invest enough time to try and see the world through his point of view. If you can’t convince yourself to do that (because you think it’s too unlikely or whatever) then you should avoid actively taking a stance. I, for example, don’t really have much clue who’s right, I don’t intend to study Miskolczi’s views. Therefore I’m just observing from outside and not acting as if I know all there is to know. But as far as I can tell you arrived here with a very solid assumption that he is wrong. You should consider reshaping that assumption…and I don’t mean just on the surface. Do it sincerely; begin to act and talk and live like someone who knows that it is absolutely possible that a seemingly incompetent scientist may just be a misunderstood but a pretty competent one.

you are arguably the most confused poster I’ve encountered on the internet. As a favor, please cite your top 5 sources of information on climate change. I think it will be very revealing.

you are arguably the most confused poster I’ve encountered on the internet. As a favor, please cite your top 5 sources of information on climate change. I think it will be very revealing.