Comments on: Hansen's Regression to Zero http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/ The Power of Numeracy Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: DG http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/#comment-2875 DG Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:35:32 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1443#comment-2875 Stronger Solar-ENSO connections than ENSO-rainfall connections in the Indian Monsoon http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AGUFM.A13B0240B Is there a link between Earth's magnetic field and low-latitude precipitation? http://geology.gsapubs.org/cgi/reprint/37/1/71.pdf Leif will be very busy debunking solar effects :) Stronger Solar-ENSO connections than ENSO-rainfall connections in the Indian Monsoon
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AGUFM.A13B0240B

Is there a link between Earth’s magnetic field and low-latitude precipitation?
http://geology.gsapubs.org/cgi/reprint/37/1/71.pdf

Leif will be very busy debunking solar effects :)

]]> By: DG http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/#comment-10240 DG Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:35:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1443#comment-10240 Stronger Solar-ENSO connections than ENSO-rainfall connections in the Indian Monsoon http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AGUFM.A13B0240B Is there a link between Earth's magnetic field and low-latitude precipitation? http://geology.gsapubs.org/cgi/reprint/37/1/71.pdf Leif will be very busy debunking solar effects :) Stronger Solar-ENSO connections than ENSO-rainfall connections in the Indian Monsoon
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AGUFM.A13B0240B

Is there a link between Earth’s magnetic field and low-latitude precipitation?
http://geology.gsapubs.org/cgi/reprint/37/1/71.pdf

Leif will be very busy debunking solar effects :)

]]> By: jae http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/#comment-2874 jae Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:27:33 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1443#comment-2874 It's fixed. It’s fixed.

]]> By: jae http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/#comment-10239 jae Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:27:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1443#comment-10239 It's fixed. It’s fixed.

]]> By: admin http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/#comment-2873 admin Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:15:17 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1443#comment-2873 jae: I thought I fixed that. Raven: Yes, if thats what's behind it, we will probably be hearing more about it. jae: I thought I fixed that.
Raven: Yes, if thats what’s behind it, we will probably be hearing more about it.

]]> By: Anonymous http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/#comment-10238 Anonymous Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:15:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1443#comment-10238 jae: I thought I fixed that. Raven: Yes, if thats what's behind it, we will probably be hearing more about it. jae: I thought I fixed that.
Raven: Yes, if thats what’s behind it, we will probably be hearing more about it.

]]> By: Raven http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/#comment-2872 Raven Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:08:03 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1443#comment-2872 The funny thing is if you google Camp&Tung Svalgaard you will find a post on tamino where the AGW boosters are agreeing that Svalgaard is right and Camp&Tung must be picking up a spurious signal. I wonder what they would say now that the Oracle has decided that Camp&Tung is required to avoid admiting the models are flawed. The funny thing is if you google Camp&Tung Svalgaard you will find a post on tamino where the AGW boosters are agreeing that Svalgaard is right and Camp&Tung must be picking up a spurious signal. I wonder what they would say now that the Oracle has decided that Camp&Tung is required to avoid admiting the models are flawed.

]]> By: Raven http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/#comment-10237 Raven Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:08:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1443#comment-10237 The funny thing is if you google Camp&Tung Svalgaard you will find a post on tamino where the AGW boosters are agreeing that Svalgaard is right and Camp&Tung must be picking up a spurious signal. I wonder what they would say now that the Oracle has decided that Camp&Tung is required to avoid admiting the models are flawed. The funny thing is if you google Camp&Tung Svalgaard you will find a post on tamino where the AGW boosters are agreeing that Svalgaard is right and Camp&Tung must be picking up a spurious signal. I wonder what they would say now that the Oracle has decided that Camp&Tung is required to avoid admiting the models are flawed.

]]> By: jae http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/#comment-2871 jae Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:42:16 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1443#comment-2871 Tung link doesn't work for me; I get the "404 page." Tung link doesn’t work for me; I get the “404 page.”

]]> By: jae http://landshape.org/enm/hansens-regression-to-zero/#comment-10236 jae Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:42:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=1443#comment-10236 Tung link doesn't work for me; I get the "404 page." Tung link doesn’t work for me; I get the “404 page.”

]]>