<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forecasting the Effects of Global Warming on Biodiversity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://landshape.org/enm/improved-predictions-of-warming-induced-extinctions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://landshape.org/enm/improved-predictions-of-warming-induced-extinctions/</link>
	<description>The Power of Numeracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niche Modeling &#187; Global Temperatures 2008</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/improved-predictions-of-warming-induced-extinctions/#comment-5962</link>
		<dc:creator>Niche Modeling &#187; Global Temperatures 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/improved-predictions-of-warming-induced-extinctions/#comment-5962</guid>
		<description>[...] Predicting global temperatures seems to be entering general awareness as a worthwhile exercise. As I have published about recently, I think climate models are inadequately validated, confidence in the skill of models to forecast global warming is vastly exaggerated, and current skill is not enough to serve useful purposes. I thought I would tabulate some of the various predictions as I come across them. This is a fair test, as the future is unknown, and at the end of the year we can see whose is most accurate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Predicting global temperatures seems to be entering general awareness as a worthwhile exercise. As I have published about recently, I think climate models are inadequately validated, confidence in the skill of models to forecast global warming is vastly exaggerated, and current skill is not enough to serve useful purposes. I thought I would tabulate some of the various predictions as I come across them. This is a fair test, as the future is unknown, and at the end of the year we can see whose is most accurate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

