Comments on: Modeling Global Warming (Miskolczi Part 1) http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/ The Power of Numeracy Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: elbucznni http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4826 elbucznni Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:31:27 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4826 h5QOcn <a href="http://ighrbrjqmpam.com/" rel="nofollow">ighrbrjqmpam</a>, [url=http://npaaytjeuxcu.com/]npaaytjeuxcu[/url], [link=http://ofturvmmwofo.com/]ofturvmmwofo[/link], http://uelsrjdvthdy.com/ h5QOcn ighrbrjqmpam, [url=http://npaaytjeuxcu.com/]npaaytjeuxcu[/url], [link=http://ofturvmmwofo.com/]ofturvmmwofo[/link], http://uelsrjdvthdy.com/

]]> By: admin http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4825 admin Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:11:46 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4825 jblethen: See Zagoni for a derivation http://hps.elte.hu/zagoni/MET-ZM_v08c_eng.pdf jblethen: See Zagoni for a derivation http://hps.elte.hu/zagoni/MET-ZM_v08c_eng.pdf

]]> By: Anonymous http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-6415 Anonymous Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:11:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-6415 jblethen: See Zagoni for a derivation http://hps.elte.hu/zagoni/MET-ZM_v08c_eng.pdf jblethen: See Zagoni for a derivation http://hps.elte.hu/zagoni/MET-ZM_v08c_eng.pdf

]]> By: jblethen http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4824 jblethen Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:36:07 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4824 Miskolczi doesn't derive his eq. 7, he states it after discussing the two flux terms of his eq. 6. Miskolczi doesn’t derive his eq. 7, he states it after discussing the two flux terms of his eq. 6.

]]> By: jblethen http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-6414 jblethen Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:36:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-6414 Miskolczi doesn't derive his eq. 7, he states it after discussing the two flux terms of his eq. 6. Miskolczi doesn’t derive his eq. 7, he states it after discussing the two flux terms of his eq. 6.

]]> By: Jan Pompe http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4823 Jan Pompe Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:37:53 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4823 jblethen #17 Eqn 2 is M7-7 simplified. jblethen #17

Eqn 2 is M7-7 simplified.

]]> By: Jan Pompe http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-6413 Jan Pompe Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:37:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-6413 jblethen #17 Eqn 2 is M7-7 simplified. jblethen #17

Eqn 2 is M7-7 simplified.

]]> By: jblethen http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4822 jblethen Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:21:52 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4822 Regarding equation (2) in your post, the conservation of energy equation, Miskolczi's equation (7): is there a proof of this equation, or is it only qualitative? Regarding equation (2) in your post, the conservation of energy equation, Miskolczi’s equation (7): is there a proof of this equation, or is it only qualitative?

]]> By: jblethen http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-6412 jblethen Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:21:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-6412 Regarding equation (2) in your post, the conservation of energy equation, Miskolczi's equation (7): is there a proof of this equation, or is it only qualitative? Regarding equation (2) in your post, the conservation of energy equation, Miskolczi’s equation (7): is there a proof of this equation, or is it only qualitative?

]]> By: admin http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4821 admin Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:46:59 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/modeling-global-warming/#comment-4821 David, you may be right. I would like to see something like that. We (blog world) have been increasingly interested in the water vapor confirmation as you can see from more recent posts. David, you may be right. I would like to see something like that. We (blog world) have been increasingly interested in the water vapor confirmation as you can see from more recent posts.

]]>