Comments on: More Evidence of Climate Stabilization http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/ The Power of Numeracy Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Klimawandel: Offener Leserbrief an Spiegel Online » Frank Wettert http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4692 Klimawandel: Offener Leserbrief an Spiegel Online » Frank Wettert Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:52:33 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4692 [...] als Irreführung der Medien und der Politik zu betrachten, als fundierte Wissenschaft. Quelle: Niche Modeling, kleine Abbildung: University of [...] [...] als Irreführung der Medien und der Politik zu betrachten, als fundierte Wissenschaft. Quelle: Niche Modeling, kleine Abbildung: University of [...]

]]> By: mondo45 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4691 mondo45 Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:37:35 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4691 You are probably aware of the misleading way in which CSIRO reported rising sea levels around Australia some time ago, as pointed out by John Daly. I made a word file of the relevant links and data which makes it very evident that CSIRO is prepared to compromise its reputation in its public presentation of such data. If you send me an e:mail, I will send you my file. In brief though, CSIRO report 25 year changes in sea level at 28 stations around Australia. Then they take a simple average to present the average rise in Australian sea level over that period. Only problem is that the data is heavily influenced by three outliers - Port Adelaide Inner, Port Adelaide Outer (yes really) and Fremantle. Googling will give you data from other CSIRO departments that show that Adelaide and Fremantle are subject to local land subsidence issues which give a misleading impression of sea level rise. You are probably aware of the misleading way in which CSIRO reported rising sea levels around Australia some time ago, as pointed out by John Daly. I made a word file of the relevant links and data which makes it very evident that CSIRO is prepared to compromise its reputation in its public presentation of such data. If you send me an e:mail, I will send you my file.

In brief though, CSIRO report 25 year changes in sea level at 28 stations around Australia. Then they take a simple average to present the average rise in Australian sea level over that period. Only problem is that the data is heavily influenced by three outliers – Port Adelaide Inner, Port Adelaide Outer (yes really) and Fremantle. Googling will give you data from other CSIRO departments that show that Adelaide and Fremantle are subject to local land subsidence issues which give a misleading impression of sea level rise.

]]> By: mondo45 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-6313 mondo45 Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:37:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-6313 You are probably aware of the misleading way in which CSIRO reported rising sea levels around Australia some time ago, as pointed out by John Daly. I made a word file of the relevant links and data which makes it very evident that CSIRO is prepared to compromise its reputation in its public presentation of such data. If you send me an e:mail, I will send you my file. In brief though, CSIRO report 25 year changes in sea level at 28 stations around Australia. Then they take a simple average to present the average rise in Australian sea level over that period. Only problem is that the data is heavily influenced by three outliers - Port Adelaide Inner, Port Adelaide Outer (yes really) and Fremantle. Googling will give you data from other CSIRO departments that show that Adelaide and Fremantle are subject to local land subsidence issues which give a misleading impression of sea level rise. You are probably aware of the misleading way in which CSIRO reported rising sea levels around Australia some time ago, as pointed out by John Daly. I made a word file of the relevant links and data which makes it very evident that CSIRO is prepared to compromise its reputation in its public presentation of such data. If you send me an e:mail, I will send you my file.

In brief though, CSIRO report 25 year changes in sea level at 28 stations around Australia. Then they take a simple average to present the average rise in Australian sea level over that period. Only problem is that the data is heavily influenced by three outliers – Port Adelaide Inner, Port Adelaide Outer (yes really) and Fremantle. Googling will give you data from other CSIRO departments that show that Adelaide and Fremantle are subject to local land subsidence issues which give a misleading impression of sea level rise.

]]> By: Niche Modeling » Bias Examples http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4690 Niche Modeling » Bias Examples Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:29:56 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4690 [...] Finally we have publication bias, the selective publication of the findings of trials with certain results: Instead of doing this, they give an endless amount of money to the side which agrees with the IPCC. The European Community, which has gone far in this thing: If you want a grant for a research project in climatology, it is written into the document that there must be a focus on global warming. All the rest of us, we can never get a coin there, because we are not fulfilling the basic obligations. … but it is exceptionally hard to get these papers published also. The publishers compare it to IPCC’s modeling, and say, “Oh, this isn’t the IPCC.” Well, luckily it’s not! But you cannot say that. This interview has examples of all the forms of research bias mentioned previously. I can’t vouch for the accuracy of these claims as I have not researched them myself. It is presented to show that the concerns with bias in global warming research are almost identical to the issues of concern in the clinical studies medicine. These concerns gave rise, after a series of scandals such as the Thalidomide tragedy, to the EBP movement. From the point of view good scientific practice, and the diminishing evidence of global warming, the IPCC is looking more like a 60’s drug company: an organization with a product to sell, involved in unscrupulous marketing of its product in the absence of evidence of both safety and efficacy. [...] [...] Finally we have publication bias, the selective publication of the findings of trials with certain results: Instead of doing this, they give an endless amount of money to the side which agrees with the IPCC. The European Community, which has gone far in this thing: If you want a grant for a research project in climatology, it is written into the document that there must be a focus on global warming. All the rest of us, we can never get a coin there, because we are not fulfilling the basic obligations. … but it is exceptionally hard to get these papers published also. The publishers compare it to IPCC’s modeling, and say, “Oh, this isn’t the IPCC.” Well, luckily it’s not! But you cannot say that. This interview has examples of all the forms of research bias mentioned previously. I can’t vouch for the accuracy of these claims as I have not researched them myself. It is presented to show that the concerns with bias in global warming research are almost identical to the issues of concern in the clinical studies medicine. These concerns gave rise, after a series of scandals such as the Thalidomide tragedy, to the EBP movement. From the point of view good scientific practice, and the diminishing evidence of global warming, the IPCC is looking more like a 60’s drug company: an organization with a product to sell, involved in unscrupulous marketing of its product in the absence of evidence of both safety and efficacy. [...]

]]> By: admin http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4689 admin Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:07:25 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4689 Yes, that is completely different to the chart I made in March. The seasonality removal is very aggressive. Yes, that is completely different to the chart I made in March. The seasonality removal is very aggressive.

]]> By: admin http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-6312 admin Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:07:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-6312 Yes, that is completely different to the chart I made in March. The seasonality removal is very aggressive. Yes, that is completely different to the chart I made in March. The seasonality removal is very aggressive.

]]> By: Franko http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4688 Franko Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:32:43 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4688 aviso.oceanobs.com - Last month the sea level chart showed 5 months down, Now it has been revised up. Instrument correction or seasonal adjustments ? Would be informative if aviso also charted the unadjusted. aviso.oceanobs.com – Last month the sea level chart showed 5 months down, Now it has been revised up. Instrument correction or seasonal adjustments ?

Would be informative if aviso also charted the unadjusted.

]]> By: Franko http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-6311 Franko Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:32:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-6311 aviso.oceanobs.com - Last month the sea level chart showed 5 months down, Now it has been revised up. Instrument correction or seasonal adjustments ? Would be informative if aviso also charted the unadjusted. aviso.oceanobs.com – Last month the sea level chart showed 5 months down, Now it has been revised up. Instrument correction or seasonal adjustments ?

Would be informative if aviso also charted the unadjusted.

]]> By: Niche Modeling » Global Temperature Falls Sharply in May 2008 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4687 Niche Modeling » Global Temperature Falls Sharply in May 2008 Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:16:26 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4687 [...] Global anomalies are now at levels experienced in 1850 at the start of the CRU record. Global temperature is clearly moving down as sea level, stratospheric temperatures and other long term integrators of global temperatures suggest. I will have more to say about the Rahmstorf et.al. (Science Brevia, 4 May 2007, p709 [1]) view that the climate “may be responding more quickly to climate change than our current generation of models indicates”, and its use as the sole source for the Interim Report of the Garnaut Review to advocate prompt and extreme action on carbon emissions (Section 2.4 Consequences of Climate Change, Observed Climate Change). Meanwhile, “Houston, we seem to have another problem.” Hat tip to Anthony Watts [...] [...] Global anomalies are now at levels experienced in 1850 at the start of the CRU record. Global temperature is clearly moving down as sea level, stratospheric temperatures and other long term integrators of global temperatures suggest. I will have more to say about the Rahmstorf et.al. (Science Brevia, 4 May 2007, p709 [1]) view that the climate “may be responding more quickly to climate change than our current generation of models indicates”, and its use as the sole source for the Interim Report of the Garnaut Review to advocate prompt and extreme action on carbon emissions (Section 2.4 Consequences of Climate Change, Observed Climate Change). Meanwhile, “Houston, we seem to have another problem.” Hat tip to Anthony Watts [...]

]]> By: Niche Modeling » http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4686 Niche Modeling » Sat, 03 May 2008 09:03:54 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/more-evidence-of-climate-stabilization/#comment-4686 [...] Niche Modeling » Rahmstorf 7 Finale @ More Evidence of Climate Stabilization [...] [...] Niche Modeling » Rahmstorf 7 Finale @ More Evidence of Climate Stabilization [...]

]]>