Comments on: Natural Variation – 60 year cycle http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/ The Power of Numeracy Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Niche Modeling » Natural Variation – 60 year cycle PV online http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/#comment-860 Niche Modeling » Natural Variation – 60 year cycle PV online Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:43:30 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3087#comment-860 [...] the original post:  Niche Modeling » Natural Variation – 60 year cycle By admin | category: principle variation | tags: agw, australian, funds, jump-the-most, [...] [...] the original post:  Niche Modeling » Natural Variation – 60 year cycle By admin | category: principle variation | tags: agw, australian, funds, jump-the-most, [...]

]]> By: davids99us http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/#comment-861 davids99us Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:15:49 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3087#comment-861 Alan, Quite possibly, but I am focussing on what can justifiably be inferredfrom these data alone. Alan, Quite possibly, but I am focussing on what can justifiably be inferredfrom these data alone.

]]> By: davids99us http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/#comment-859 davids99us Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:15:49 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3087#comment-859 Alan, Quite possibly, but I am focussing on what can justifiably be inferredfrom these data alone. Alan, Quite possibly, but I am focussing on what can justifiably be inferredfrom these data alone.

]]> By: Anonymous http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/#comment-11939 Anonymous Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:15:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3087#comment-11939 Alan, Quite possibly, but I am focussing on what can justifiably be inferred from these data alone. Alan, Quite possibly, but I am focussing on what can justifiably be inferred
from these data alone.

]]> By: Alan Cheetham http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/#comment-858 Alan Cheetham Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:51:17 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3087#comment-858 The 60-70 year cycle is clearly evident in the data (see: <a href="http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/ArcticCycles.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/ArcticCycles.htm</a> and <a href="http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW_Summary.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW_Summary.htm</a>There is also a longer cycle with an unknown cycle length that is resulting in a net warming after each 60-year cycle.An analogy: We have been measuring data each minute for two days now -- it went through two warming and cooling cycles and today was warmer than yesterday (the warmest yet observed!). We haven't observed long enough to see that the days are also on a yearly cycle -- each daily cycle is getting warmer in this spring, but eventually there will be net cooling in the longer term cycle. The 60-70 year cycle is clearly evident in the data (see: http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/ArcticCycles.htm and http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW_Summary.htmThere is also a longer cycle with an unknown cycle length that is resulting in a net warming after each 60-year cycle.An analogy: We have been measuring data each minute for two days now — it went through two warming and cooling cycles and today was warmer than yesterday (the warmest yet observed!). We haven't observed long enough to see that the days are also on a yearly cycle — each daily cycle is getting warmer in this spring, but eventually there will be net cooling in the longer term cycle.

]]> By: Alan Cheetham http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/#comment-11933 Alan Cheetham Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:51:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3087#comment-11933 The 60-70 year cycle is clearly evident in the data (see: <a href="http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/ArcticCycles.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/ArcticCycles.htm</a> and <a href="http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW_Summary.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW_Summary.htm</a> There is also a longer cycle with an unknown cycle length that is resulting in a net warming after each 60-year cycle. An analogy: We have been measuring data each minute for two days now -- it went through two warming and cooling cycles and today was warmer than yesterday (the warmest yet observed!). We haven't observed long enough to see that the days are also on a yearly cycle -- each daily cycle is getting warmer in this spring, but eventually there will be net cooling in the longer term cycle. The 60-70 year cycle is clearly evident in the data (see: http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/ArcticCycles.htm and http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW_Summary.htm

There is also a longer cycle with an unknown cycle length that is resulting in a net warming after each 60-year cycle.

An analogy: We have been measuring data each minute for two days now — it went through two warming and cooling cycles and today was warmer than yesterday (the warmest yet observed!). We haven’t observed long enough to see that the days are also on a yearly cycle — each daily cycle is getting warmer in this spring, but eventually there will be net cooling in the longer term cycle.

]]> By: davids99us http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/#comment-857 davids99us Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:26:25 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3087#comment-857 Peter, I wonder what would be the distinguishing feature(s) that produce thedifference in response between those domains? Peter, I wonder what would be the distinguishing feature(s) that produce thedifference in response between those domains?

]]> By: Anonymous http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/#comment-11902 Anonymous Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:26:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3087#comment-11902 Peter, I wonder what would be the distinguishing feature(s) that produce the difference in response between those domains? Peter, I wonder what would be the distinguishing feature(s) that produce the
difference in response between those domains?

]]> By: Andrew http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/#comment-856 Andrew Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:09:44 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3087#comment-856 This fits well with my previous identification of two identical warming periods in the twentieth century. I still think an AGW signal could be isolated, but definitely one first has to explain why the 1911-1941 warming occurred at the same rate as the 1978-2008 one. This fits well with my previous identification of two identical warming periods in the twentieth century. I still think an AGW signal could be isolated, but definitely one first has to explain why the 1911-1941 warming occurred at the same rate as the 1978-2008 one.

]]> By: Andrew http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-60-year-cycl/#comment-11901 Andrew Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:09:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3087#comment-11901 This fits well with my previous identification of two identical warming periods in the twentieth century. I still think an AGW signal could be isolated, but definitely one first has to explain why the 1911-1941 warming occurred at the same rate as the 1978-2008 one. This fits well with my previous identification of two identical warming periods in the twentieth century. I still think an AGW signal could be isolated, but definitely one first has to explain why the 1911-1941 warming occurred at the same rate as the 1978-2008 one.

]]>