Comments on: Natural Variation vs Human Influence http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/ The Power of Numeracy Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: cohenite http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/#comment-883 cohenite Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:05:41 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3104#comment-883 Nick, you've verballed me; you raised the date of 1950 first in your initial comment; your CO2 graphs are also misleading in the usual way; fig's 5 & 6 here explain why;<a href="http://brneurosci.org/co2.html" rel="nofollow">http://brneurosci.org/co2.html</a>although to be honest I like Roy Spencer's version;<a href="http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/01/50-years-of-co2-time-for-a-vision-test/" rel="nofollow">http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/01/50-years-of...</a> Nick, you've verballed me; you raised the date of 1950 first in your initial comment; your CO2 graphs are also misleading in the usual way; fig's 5 & 6 here explain why;http://brneurosci.org/co2.htmlalthough to be honest I like Roy Spencer's version;http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/01/50-years-of…

]]> By: davids99us http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/#comment-884 davids99us Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:21:02 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3104#comment-884 Its just a mystery ;-) Its just a mystery ;-)

]]> By: cohenite http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/#comment-882 cohenite Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:05:41 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3104#comment-882 Nick, you've verballed me; you raised the date of 1950 first in your initial comment; your CO2 graphs are also misleading in the usual way; fig's 5 & 6 here explain why;<a href="http://brneurosci.org/co2.html" rel="nofollow">http://brneurosci.org/co2.html</a>although to be honest I like Roy Spencer's version;<a href="http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/01/50-years-of-co2-time-for-a-vision-test/" rel="nofollow">http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/01/50-years-of...</a> Nick, you've verballed me; you raised the date of 1950 first in your initial comment; your CO2 graphs are also misleading in the usual way; fig's 5 & 6 here explain why;http://brneurosci.org/co2.htmlalthough to be honest I like Roy Spencer's version;http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/01/50-years-of…

]]> By: cohenite http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/#comment-11924 cohenite Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:05:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3104#comment-11924 Nick, you've verballed me; you raised the date of 1950 first in your initial comment; your CO2 graphs are also misleading in the usual way; fig's 5 & 6 here explain why; http://brneurosci.org/co2.html although to be honest I like Roy Spencer's version; http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/01/50-years-of-co2-time-for-a-vision-test/ Nick, you’ve verballed me; you raised the date of 1950 first in your initial comment; your CO2 graphs are also misleading in the usual way; fig’s 5 & 6 here explain why;

http://brneurosci.org/co2.html

although to be honest I like Roy Spencer’s version;

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/01/50-years-of-co2-time-for-a-vision-test/

]]> By: davids99us http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/#comment-881 davids99us Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:21:02 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3104#comment-881 Its just a mystery ;-) Its just a mystery ;-)

]]> By: Anonymous http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/#comment-11923 Anonymous Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:21:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3104#comment-11923 Its just a mystery ;-) Its just a mystery ;-)

]]> By: Nick Stokes http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/#comment-880 Nick Stokes Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:11:39 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3104#comment-880 No, that's the point. It's the lower frequency (longer cycle) that generates the harmonics (frequency multiples). No, that's the point. It's the lower frequency (longer cycle) that generates the harmonics (frequency multiples).

]]> By: Nick Stokes http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/#comment-11922 Nick Stokes Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:11:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3104#comment-11922 No, that's the point. It's the lower frequency (longer cycle) that generates the harmonics (frequency multiples). No, that’s the point. It’s the lower frequency (longer cycle) that generates the harmonics (frequency multiples).

]]> By: Andrew http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/#comment-879 Andrew Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:27:40 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3104#comment-879 "The 63 year "natural" period, is highly speculative"It is the only theory so far which explains the 1911-1941 warming occurring at the same rate as the 1978-2008 warming. “The 63 year “natural” period, is highly speculative”It is the only theory so far which explains the 1911-1941 warming occurring at the same rate as the 1978-2008 warming.

]]> By: Andrew http://landshape.org/enm/natural-variation-vs-human-influence/#comment-11921 Andrew Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:27:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3104#comment-11921 "The 63 year "natural" period, is highly speculative" It is the only theory so far which explains the 1911-1941 warming occurring at the same rate as the 1978-2008 warming. “The 63 year “natural” period, is highly speculative”

It is the only theory so far which explains the 1911-1941 warming occurring at the same rate as the 1978-2008 warming.

]]>