<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ocean Heat Content Stumbles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/</link>
	<description>The Power of Numeracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3023#comment-796</guid>
		<description>I might try and get to that, but I also expect that the data is too sparse to get any good (that is, statistically &quot;robust&quot; in the sense that they are fairly firm-not &quot;good&quot; in the  &quot;I like them&quot; kind of way) answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might try and get to that, but I also expect that the data is too sparse to get any good (that is, statistically &#8220;robust&#8221; in the sense that they are fairly firm-not &#8220;good&#8221; in the  &#8220;I like them&#8221; kind of way) answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davids99us</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>davids99us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3023#comment-795</guid>
		<description>IMHO these analyses need the CI&#039;s to show the probability the rate exceeds the expected rate.  Not sure if there is enough data though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO these analyses need the CI&#039;s to show the probability the rate exceeds the expected rate.  Not sure if there is enough data though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3023#comment-794</guid>
		<description>I might try and get to that, but I also expect that the data is too sparse to get any good (that is, statistically &quot;robust&quot; in the sense that they are fairly firm-not &quot;good&quot; in the  &quot;I like them&quot; kind of way) answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might try and get to that, but I also expect that the data is too sparse to get any good (that is, statistically &#8220;robust&#8221; in the sense that they are fairly firm-not &#8220;good&#8221; in the  &#8220;I like them&#8221; kind of way) answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/#comment-11896</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3023#comment-11896</guid>
		<description>I might try and get to that, but I also expect that the data is too sparse to get any good (that is, statistically &quot;robust&quot; in the sense that they are fairly firm-not &quot;good&quot; in the  &quot;I like them&quot; kind of way) answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might try and get to that, but I also expect that the data is too sparse to get any good (that is, statistically &#8220;robust&#8221; in the sense that they are fairly firm-not &#8220;good&#8221; in the  &#8220;I like them&#8221; kind of way) answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davids99us</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>davids99us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3023#comment-793</guid>
		<description>IMHO these analyses need the CI&#039;s to show the probability the rate exceeds the expected rate.  Not sure if there is enough data though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO these analyses need the CI&#039;s to show the probability the rate exceeds the expected rate.  Not sure if there is enough data though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/#comment-11895</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3023#comment-11895</guid>
		<description>IMHO these analyses need the CI&#039;s to show the probability the rate exceeds the expected rate.  Not sure if there is enough data though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO these analyses need the CI&#8217;s to show the probability the rate exceeds the expected rate.  Not sure if there is enough data though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3023#comment-792</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my initial reaction:&lt;a href=&quot;http://devoidofnulls.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/accleration-redux/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://devoidofnulls.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/a...&lt;/a&gt;My impression is that the Ocean Heat Content data unsurprisingly shows that same spurious acceleration effect I discussed with you earlier (namely, the curve changes sign of rate of change suddenly, without much change in the rate before or after.) Needless to say, I don&#039;t regard the claims of accelerating OHC rise as very impressive.I would also appreciate it if anyone can find any errors I made in my analysis. For instance, can anyone else verify the very large slopes I seem to be getting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s my initial reaction:<a href="http://devoidofnulls.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/accleration-redux/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://devoidofnulls.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/a" rel="nofollow">http://devoidofnulls.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/a</a>&#8230;My impression is that the Ocean Heat Content data unsurprisingly shows that same spurious acceleration effect I discussed with you earlier (namely, the curve changes sign of rate of change suddenly, without much change in the rate before or after.) Needless to say, I don&#039;t regard the claims of accelerating OHC rise as very impressive.I would also appreciate it if anyone can find any errors I made in my analysis. For instance, can anyone else verify the very large slopes I seem to be getting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/#comment-11893</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3023#comment-11893</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my initial reaction:

http://devoidofnulls.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/accleration-redux/

My impression is that the Ocean Heat Content data unsurprisingly shows that same spurious acceleration effect I discussed with you earlier (namely, the curve changes sign of rate of change suddenly, without much change in the rate before or after.) Needless to say, I don&#039;t regard the claims of accelerating OHC rise as very impressive.

I would also appreciate it if anyone can find any errors I made in my analysis. For instance, can anyone else verify the very large slopes I seem to be getting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my initial reaction:</p>
<p><a href="http://devoidofnulls.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/accleration-redux/" rel="nofollow">http://devoidofnulls.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/accleration-redux/</a></p>
<p>My impression is that the Ocean Heat Content data unsurprisingly shows that same spurious acceleration effect I discussed with you earlier (namely, the curve changes sign of rate of change suddenly, without much change in the rate before or after.) Needless to say, I don&#8217;t regard the claims of accelerating OHC rise as very impressive.</p>
<p>I would also appreciate it if anyone can find any errors I made in my analysis. For instance, can anyone else verify the very large slopes I seem to be getting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stokes</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stokes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3023#comment-791</guid>
		<description>No worries. I&#039;m generally a worrier about OHC data. I wish it was better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries. I&#039;m generally a worrier about OHC data. I wish it was better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stokes</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/ocean-heat-content-stumbles/#comment-11873</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stokes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3023#comment-11873</guid>
		<description>No worries. I&#039;m generally a doubter about OHC data. I wish it was better.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries. I&#8217;m generally a doubter about OHC data. I wish it was better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

