Comments on: Predicting global temperature http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/ The Power of Numeracy Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: http://test.com http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/#comment-970 http://test.com Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:50:15 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3237#comment-970 <strong>test...</strong> zzotBt1 | test ... test…

zzotBt1 | test …

]]> By: Niche Modeling » Global temperatures near 2 year high http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/#comment-969 Niche Modeling » Global temperatures near 2 year high Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:10:07 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3237#comment-969 [...] EMD prediction, shown above, indicates that quasi-periodic cycles are due for a downturn, agreeing with the other indicators [...] [...] EMD prediction, shown above, indicates that quasi-periodic cycles are due for a downturn, agreeing with the other indicators [...]

]]> By: davids99us http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/#comment-972 davids99us Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:59:58 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3237#comment-972 Yes, good idea. Yes, good idea.

]]> By: cohenite http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/#comment-971 cohenite Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:38:15 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3237#comment-971 Couldn't you do an EMD of historical tipping points; say the Younger Dryas and the PETM or any series of Dansgaard-Oeschger events and see if there is any commonality between them and with the modern equivalent of decomposed factors? Couldn't you do an EMD of historical tipping points; say the Younger Dryas and the PETM or any series of Dansgaard-Oeschger events and see if there is any commonality between them and with the modern equivalent of decomposed factors?

]]> By: Anonymous http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/#comment-11994 Anonymous Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:59:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3237#comment-11994 Yes, good idea. Yes, good idea.

]]> By: cohenite http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/#comment-11993 cohenite Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:38:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3237#comment-11993 Couldn't you do an EMD of historical tipping points; say the Younger Dryas and the PETM or any series of Dansgaard-Oeschger events and see if there is any commonality between them and with the modern equivalent of decomposed factors? Couldn’t you do an EMD of historical tipping points; say the Younger Dryas and the PETM or any series of Dansgaard-Oeschger events and see if there is any commonality between them and with the modern equivalent of decomposed factors?

]]> By: davids99us http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/#comment-973 davids99us Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:34:46 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3237#comment-973 In the quasi-mechanical framework I am thinking of, the anti-persistence behavior is similar to a restoring force in a dynamical system (eg a spring). Then the main assumption is that the restoring force is conservative, that is, is the restoring force the same if the system moves in a circle back to the same point. If not, then yes, the system could move in a trajectory but equilibrate back at at different temperature, even when the forcings are the same. It could then do that again, essentially spiralling out of control. I admit this is getting out of my depth, but the question may be answerable on the basis of the conservativeness of the anti-persistence. Is Miskolczi conservative, and Eddington not? I don't know. In the quasi-mechanical framework I am thinking of, the anti-persistence behavior is similar to a restoring force in a dynamical system (eg a spring). Then the main assumption is that the restoring force is conservative, that is, is the restoring force the same if the system moves in a circle back to the same point. If not, then yes, the system could move in a trajectory but equilibrate back at at different temperature, even when the forcings are the same. It could then do that again, essentially spiralling out of control. I admit this is getting out of my depth, but the question may be answerable on the basis of the conservativeness of the anti-persistence. Is Miskolczi conservative, and Eddington not? I don't know.

]]> By: davids99us http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/#comment-968 davids99us Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:59:58 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3237#comment-968 Yes, good idea. Yes, good idea.

]]> By: cohenite http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/#comment-967 cohenite Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:38:15 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3237#comment-967 Couldn't you do an EMD of historical tipping points; say the Younger Dryas and the PETM or any series of Dansgaard-Oeschger events and see if there is any commonality between them and with the modern equivalent of decomposed factors? Couldn't you do an EMD of historical tipping points; say the Younger Dryas and the PETM or any series of Dansgaard-Oeschger events and see if there is any commonality between them and with the modern equivalent of decomposed factors?

]]> By: Anonymous http://landshape.org/enm/predicting-global-temperature/#comment-11992 Anonymous Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:34:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=3237#comment-11992 In the quasi-mechanical framework I am thinking of, the anti-persistence behavior is similar to a restoring force in a dynamical system (eg a spring). Then the main assumption is that the restoring force is conservative, that is, is the restoring force the same if the system moves in a circle back to the same point. If not, then yes, the system could move in a trajectory but equilibrate back at at different temperature, even when the forcings are the same. It could then do that again, essentially spiralling out of control. I admit this is getting out of my depth, but the question may be answerable on the basis of the conservativeness of the anti-persistence. Is Miskolczi conservative, and Eddington not? I don't know. In the quasi-mechanical framework I am thinking of, the anti-persistence behavior is similar to a restoring force in a dynamical system (eg a spring). Then the main assumption is that the restoring force is conservative, that is, is the restoring force the same if the system moves in a circle back to the same point. If not, then yes, the system could move in a trajectory but equilibrate back at at different temperature, even when the forcings are the same. It could then do that again, essentially spiralling out of control.

I admit this is getting out of my depth, but the question may be answerable on the basis of the conservativeness of the anti-persistence. Is Miskolczi conservative, and Eddington not? I don’t know.

]]>