http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/ The Power of Numeracy Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comment-1911 davids99us Sun, 16 Aug 2009 03:33:40 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2871#comment-1911 Andrew, If you don't promote CAGW chances are you will offend the sensibilities of a reviewer. Its because so many academics are kissing the ring of AGW so they can get published that science is in this mess. Andrew, If you don't promote CAGW chances are you will offend the sensibilities of a reviewer. Its because so many academics are kissing the ring of AGW so they can get published that science is in this mess.

]]> http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comment-1910 Andrew Sun, 16 Aug 2009 03:09:54 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2871#comment-1910 Yes, yes, but I'm worried about it getting <i>published</i>. And these days the last thing you want to do is offend the "sensibilities" of an already hostile reviewer. Yes, yes, but I'm worried about it getting published. And these days the last thing you want to do is offend the “sensibilities” of an already hostile reviewer.

]]> http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comment-1909 davids99us Sun, 16 Aug 2009 02:32:52 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2871#comment-1909 Aw. But then no-one will read it. This is not about is it or isn't it. The slope of the SOI is not significantly different from zero. The only question is if the slope is significantly different from not zero. Aw. But then no-one will read it. This is not about is it or isn't it. The slope of the SOI is not significantly different from zero. The only question is if the slope is significantly different from not zero.

]]> http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comment-1912 Andrew Sun, 16 Aug 2009 02:25:08 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2871#comment-1912 Or "Detecting Trends In the Walker Circulation: Does Decadal Variability Create the Illusion of a Decline?" Or “Detecting Trends In the Walker Circulation: Does Decadal Variability Create the Illusion of a Decline?”

]]> http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comment-1908 Andrew Sun, 16 Aug 2009 02:20:39 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2871#comment-1908 I would advise a less inflammatory title, like "Weakening of the Walker Circulation?"Or "Interpretation of Trends in the Strength of the Walker Circulation: Real Decline or Recent Shift?" I would advise a less inflammatory title, like “Weakening of the Walker Circulation?”Or “Interpretation of Trends in the Strength of the Walker Circulation: Real Decline or Recent Shift?”

]]> http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comment-1907 davids99us Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:01:53 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2871#comment-1907 Yes, I done some more analysis. Thinking of starting a new article: "The Walker Circulation is not Weakening". Yes, I done some more analysis. Thinking of starting a new article: “The Walker Circulation is not Weakening”.

]]> http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comment-1906 davids99us Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:33:40 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2871#comment-1906 Andrew, If you don't promote CAGW chances are you will offend the sensibilities of a reviewer. Its because so many academics are kissing the ring of AGW so they can get published that science is in this mess. Andrew, If you don't promote CAGW chances are you will offend the sensibilities of a reviewer. Its because so many academics are kissing the ring of AGW so they can get published that science is in this mess.

]]> http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comment-11689 Anonymous Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:33:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2871#comment-11689 Andrew, If you don't promote CAGW chances are you will offend the sensibilities of a reviewer. Its because so many academics are kissing the ring of AGW so they can get published that science is in this mess. Andrew, If you don’t promote CAGW chances are you will offend the sensibilities of a reviewer. Its because so many academics are kissing the ring of AGW so they can get published that science is in this mess.

]]> http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comment-1905 Andrew Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:09:54 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2871#comment-1905 Yes, yes, but I'm worried about it getting <i>published</i>. And these days the last thing you want to do is offend the "sensibilities" of an already hostile reviewer. Yes, yes, but I'm worried about it getting published. And these days the last thing you want to do is offend the “sensibilities” of an already hostile reviewer.

]]> http://landshape.org/enm/weakening-of-the-walker-circulation/#comment-11688 Andrew Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:09:00 +0000 http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2871#comment-11688 Yes, yes, but I'm worried about it getting <i>published</i>. And these days the last thing you want to do is offend the "sensibilities" of an already hostile reviewer. Yes, yes, but I’m worried about it getting published. And these days the last thing you want to do is offend the “sensibilities” of an already hostile reviewer.

]]>