<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weird Equations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/</link>
	<description>The Power of Numeracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: prdnpf</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/#comment-2207</link>
		<dc:creator>prdnpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2058#comment-2207</guid>
		<description>s2F8pZ  &lt;a href=&quot;http://nrweenkqvekt.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nrweenkqvekt&lt;/a&gt;, [url=http://uvuxgzxpqtte.com/]uvuxgzxpqtte[/url], [link=http://tulerxfekshc.com/]tulerxfekshc[/link], http://uoqpftsistjo.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s2F8pZ  <a href="http://nrweenkqvekt.com/" rel="nofollow">nrweenkqvekt</a>, [url=http://uvuxgzxpqtte.com/]uvuxgzxpqtte[/url], [link=http://tulerxfekshc.com/]tulerxfekshc[/link], <a href="http://uoqpftsistjo.com/" rel="nofollow">http://uoqpftsistjo.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnkat</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2058#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>admin,

my feeling is that as long as people are involved, and corruptible/influenced by less than perfect information and theories, regulation is more likely to make people feel more sure of themselves than they should be. You know, like statistics!!

In other words, regulation actually has helped make these bubbles much larger than they could have been in a non-regulated environment where people would, for good reason, be less trusting of institutions!!

Sadly, many people actually still trust gubmint to a greater extent than deserved.

Of course, in either scenario, it still takes a legal system where crooks who take advantage of others are actually PUNISHED!! So far no one in in gubmint or business, except Madoff and other small time crooks, are in any danger of losing money or liberty over their abuses of the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>admin,</p>
<p>my feeling is that as long as people are involved, and corruptible/influenced by less than perfect information and theories, regulation is more likely to make people feel more sure of themselves than they should be. You know, like statistics!!</p>
<p>In other words, regulation actually has helped make these bubbles much larger than they could have been in a non-regulated environment where people would, for good reason, be less trusting of institutions!!</p>
<p>Sadly, many people actually still trust gubmint to a greater extent than deserved.</p>
<p>Of course, in either scenario, it still takes a legal system where crooks who take advantage of others are actually PUNISHED!! So far no one in in gubmint or business, except Madoff and other small time crooks, are in any danger of losing money or liberty over their abuses of the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnkat</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/#comment-10781</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2058#comment-10781</guid>
		<description>admin,

my feeling is that as long as people are involved, and corruptible/influenced by less than perfect information and theories, regulation is more likely to make people feel more sure of themselves than they should be. You know, like statistics!! 

In other words, regulation actually has helped make these bubbles much larger than they could have been in a non-regulated environment where people would, for good reason, be less trusting of institutions!!

Sadly, many people actually still trust gubmint to a greater extent than deserved.

Of course, in either scenario, it still takes a legal system where crooks who take advantage of others are actually PUNISHED!! So far no one in in gubmint or business, except Madoff and other small time crooks, are in any danger of losing money or liberty over their abuses of the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>admin,</p>
<p>my feeling is that as long as people are involved, and corruptible/influenced by less than perfect information and theories, regulation is more likely to make people feel more sure of themselves than they should be. You know, like statistics!! </p>
<p>In other words, regulation actually has helped make these bubbles much larger than they could have been in a non-regulated environment where people would, for good reason, be less trusting of institutions!!</p>
<p>Sadly, many people actually still trust gubmint to a greater extent than deserved.</p>
<p>Of course, in either scenario, it still takes a legal system where crooks who take advantage of others are actually PUNISHED!! So far no one in in gubmint or business, except Madoff and other small time crooks, are in any danger of losing money or liberty over their abuses of the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2058#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>It seems to becoming recognized that repealing of key aspects of the Glass-Steagall Act was a major contributing factor.  This act ensures that banks are banks, investment houses investments houses, and not mixtures.  One would hope it gets put back the way it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to becoming recognized that repealing of key aspects of the Glass-Steagall Act was a major contributing factor.  This act ensures that banks are banks, investment houses investments houses, and not mixtures.  One would hope it gets put back the way it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/#comment-10780</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2058#comment-10780</guid>
		<description>It seems to becoming recognized that repealing of key aspects of the Glass-Steagall Act was a major contributing factor.  This act ensures that banks are banks, investment houses investments houses, and not mixtures.  One would hope it gets put back the way it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to becoming recognized that repealing of key aspects of the Glass-Steagall Act was a major contributing factor.  This act ensures that banks are banks, investment houses investments houses, and not mixtures.  One would hope it gets put back the way it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/#comment-2204</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2058#comment-2204</guid>
		<description>Mish made a reasonable argument for letting AIG fail, because they were largely backstop insurance for the instruments, the counterparties (mainly international banks) could have been compensated directly on AIGs default, rather than establishing Maiden Lane I II and III and who knows what else to keep them afloat.  Winding up AIG is much simpler that entangling a complex intermediary, say.  Question is, was the decision to put AIG on life support just a bad decision in the heat of the moment, or as the article argues, the good old boys calling in favors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mish made a reasonable argument for letting AIG fail, because they were largely backstop insurance for the instruments, the counterparties (mainly international banks) could have been compensated directly on AIGs default, rather than establishing Maiden Lane I II and III and who knows what else to keep them afloat.  Winding up AIG is much simpler that entangling a complex intermediary, say.  Question is, was the decision to put AIG on life support just a bad decision in the heat of the moment, or as the article argues, the good old boys calling in favors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/#comment-10779</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2058#comment-10779</guid>
		<description>Mish made a reasonable argument for letting AIG fail, because they were largely backstop insurance for the instruments, the counterparties (mainly international banks) could have been compensated directly on AIGs default, rather than establishing Maiden Lane I II and III and who knows what else to keep them afloat.  Winding up AIG is much simpler that entangling a complex intermediary, say.  Question is, was the decision to put AIG on life support just a bad decision in the heat of the moment, or as the article argues, the good old boys calling in favors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mish made a reasonable argument for letting AIG fail, because they were largely backstop insurance for the instruments, the counterparties (mainly international banks) could have been compensated directly on AIGs default, rather than establishing Maiden Lane I II and III and who knows what else to keep them afloat.  Winding up AIG is much simpler that entangling a complex intermediary, say.  Question is, was the decision to put AIG on life support just a bad decision in the heat of the moment, or as the article argues, the good old boys calling in favors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnkat</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/#comment-2203</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2058#comment-2203</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t understand why he put so much emphasis on regulation or lack thereof. He himself admitted that the regulator COULD HAVE shut down AIG but ACCEPTED THEIR WORD for the validity of the derivatives!!!

This is what happens when POLITICS is mixed with BUSINESS!!!

NO regulation. If you F!#@ up, YOU PAY!!!

Bring back debtors prison. Send them to GITMO!!!!



&quot;When one considers the comparatively extensive system of congressional checks and balances that goes into the spending of every dollar in the budget via the normal appropriations process, &quot;

This man is delusional. A lot of excellent information though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t understand why he put so much emphasis on regulation or lack thereof. He himself admitted that the regulator COULD HAVE shut down AIG but ACCEPTED THEIR WORD for the validity of the derivatives!!!</p>
<p>This is what happens when POLITICS is mixed with BUSINESS!!!</p>
<p>NO regulation. If you F!#@ up, YOU PAY!!!</p>
<p>Bring back debtors prison. Send them to GITMO!!!!</p>
<p>&#8220;When one considers the comparatively extensive system of congressional checks and balances that goes into the spending of every dollar in the budget via the normal appropriations process, &#8221;</p>
<p>This man is delusional. A lot of excellent information though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnkat</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/#comment-10778</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2058#comment-10778</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t understand why he put so much emphasis on regulation or lack thereof. He himself admitted that the regulator COULD HAVE shut down AIG but ACCEPTED THEIR WORD for the validity of the derivatives!!!

This is what happens when POLITICS is mixed with BUSINESS!!!

NO regulation. If you F!#@ up, YOU PAY!!!

Bring back debtors prison. Send them to GITMO!!!!



&quot;When one considers the comparatively extensive system of congressional checks and balances that goes into the spending of every dollar in the budget via the normal appropriations process, &quot;

This man is delusional. A lot of excellent information though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t understand why he put so much emphasis on regulation or lack thereof. He himself admitted that the regulator COULD HAVE shut down AIG but ACCEPTED THEIR WORD for the validity of the derivatives!!!</p>
<p>This is what happens when POLITICS is mixed with BUSINESS!!!</p>
<p>NO regulation. If you F!#@ up, YOU PAY!!!</p>
<p>Bring back debtors prison. Send them to GITMO!!!!</p>
<p>&#8220;When one considers the comparatively extensive system of congressional checks and balances that goes into the spending of every dollar in the budget via the normal appropriations process, &#8221;</p>
<p>This man is delusional. A lot of excellent information though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weird Equations</title>
		<link>http://landshape.org/enm/weird-equations/#comment-2202</link>
		<dc:creator>Weird Equations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landshape.org/enm/?p=2058#comment-2202</guid>
		<description>[...] Random Feed wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptExpert Trading Futures &amp; Forex (fx) Markets.Trader Guru Of 19 Years Trading Experiences Finally Revealed His Winning Methods In Global Futures &amp; Forex (fx) Markets. Personal Finance Software By Parcus Group.100% Positive Customer Feedback, Take Or Improve Control Of Your Money, Learn How To Manage Finances &amp; Invest, Increase Your Financial Intelligence, Take Care About Financial Future Of Your Family. This is a brilliant riff on the financial crisis and how it got to where it is today. Some of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Random Feed wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptExpert Trading Futures &#038; Forex (fx) Markets.Trader Guru Of 19 Years Trading Experiences Finally Revealed His Winning Methods In Global Futures &#038; Forex (fx) Markets. Personal Finance Software By Parcus Group.100% Positive Customer Feedback, Take Or Improve Control Of Your Money, Learn How To Manage Finances &#038; Invest, Increase Your Financial Intelligence, Take Care About Financial Future Of Your Family. This is a brilliant riff on the financial crisis and how it got to where it is today. Some of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

